Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jeremy Fowler: Panthers have done their due diligence on QB Jimmy Garoppolo


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'd be fine with him.

Panthers need someone to put Darnold on the bench. They also need someone just competent enough to get through the season but not win too much so they can adequately tank next year too.

I can't imagine wanting to try and take more shortcuts this rebuild. Sam can't be allowed on the field and they have to eat his contract a year. Jimmy would fit the bill and his contract would come off the books soon, too, meaning cap room with a rookie QB at that juncture.

This is the year to trade down and fix the offensive line, Rhule dug us this hole and they need to lay in it. 

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

I'd be fine with him.

Panthers need someone to put Darnold on the bench. They also need someone just competent enough to get through the season but not win too much so they can adequately tank next year too.

I can't imagine wanting to try and take more shortcuts this rebuild. Sam can't be allowed on the field and they have to eat his contract a year. Jimmy would fit the bill and his contract would come off the books soon, too, meaning cap room with a rookie QB at that juncture.

This is the year to trade down and fix the offensive line, Rhule dug us this hole and they need to lay in it. 

Glad you have no say, Jesus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

That (Jettisoning Darnold) would be the only way I would do something like this, with the possible exception on Minshew on the cheap.  Even then, it would be only because we have zero QBs on the roster who are under contract after this season, and thankfully so.  

Oh yeah, I agree. I said as much if you read and understand what I said. Minshew would be one of the "journeyman" that I was referencing. I would think we'd have to keep Darnold in the case of Minshew because why would Philly take on his contract? Hell, we'd have to pay them additional resources just to take on Darnold, and that would likely lead to something unacceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

I'd be fine with him.

Panthers need someone to put Darnold on the bench. They also need someone just competent enough to get through the season but not win too much so they can adequately tank next year too.

I can't imagine wanting to try and take more shortcuts this rebuild. Sam can't be allowed on the field and they have to eat his contract a year. Jimmy would fit the bill and his contract would come off the books soon, too, meaning cap room with a rookie QB at that juncture.

This is the year to trade down and fix the offensive line, Rhule dug us this hole and they need to lay in it. 

You're gonna end up paying $40M for Jimmy G when you combine his cap hit with Darnold's. That should be a complete nonstarter.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I care. I just don't have an answer.

Someone asked me in one of these recent threads who I wanted at quarterback, and I realized there isn't anybody available I'd say "yes" to.

There's not a single qb available out there that's going to change the trajectory of this team next season. 

My only hope is that whomever it is that they make it entertaining enough to tune in for each game. 

That's how low my confidence in this franchise has become. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This season represents the lack of vision--they went after an underperforming Darnold without a backup plan.  They should have drafted Fields, tbh--even if they had Darnold.  Instead, they had to give Darnold his fifth year contract because he was doing fairly well and we did not have a backup plan.  Then it went south, and Rhule is now confronted with either another retread or a rookie---no vision.

Scott Fitterer wants a rookie, but this year? Who knows.  I keep thinking that Pickett will be Pick 6--and I hope that is not irony (Pick it at Pick 6).

They sure found themselves in a mell of a hess.

 

I get the feeling that Rhule lost his hope for success when Cleveland signed Watson.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Oh yeah, I agree. I said as much if you read and understand what I said. Minshew would be one of the "journeyman" that I was referencing. I would think we'd have to keep Darnold in the case of Minshew because why would Philly take on his contract? Hell, we'd have to pay them additional resources just to take on Darnold, and that would likely lead to something unacceptable.

Yeah, I don't see anybody taking Darnold at this point.  He's ours this year, whether anybody likes it or not.  Roughly $18.5M reasons.  Luckily, unless we do something epically stupid, it is one year. 

While PT Barnum was correct (and probably an optimist), it is going to take a day's worth of suckers to find one big enough for Darnold's salary.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I hope their due diligence told them he sucks because he does. Take him off the Niners' great roster with a very good offensive coach and put him here and he's probably indistinguishable from Sam Darnold.

Qbs that suck don't go to a Super Bowl and another Conference Championship. They just don't no matter what team they're on. Yeah you can say his recent injury is something to stay away from, but to say he has sucked is inaccurate at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...