Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

This team's inability to just draft a LT even over higher rated defensive prospects has been one of if not the top reason why we haven't had sustained success. It just doesn't matter about a DE or another CB or S or whatever, this team requires a LT and there will be one worth drafting there. Anything else is inexcusable at this point. If they pick defense at that slot with one of the top 3 LTs on the board I'd fire them all immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ThPantherFan said:

I respect your opinion but we are in too bad of a need a LT not to take one in the 6th.

I don't disagree but if there is a run in LT's and one of those elite DE prospects drops then pass rushers are equally as valuable as LT's. Although LT's are much harder to come by.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Zod said:

Just got a text telling me not to be too shocked should the Panthers go defense at 6. Apparently there is more than one scenerio where this could happen. 

The elite picks are OT and edge rusher.   If one of the top OT dont fall then we could still use another edge rusher.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tr3ach said:

The elite picks are OT and edge rusher.   If one of the top OT dont fall then we could still use another edge rusher.

That's the thing, we just lost our best pass rusher. After Burns it's just a bunch of depth guys.

It isn't like we don't need a DE. And I have been beating the drum for years for that LT but if they are gone, get another elite, high value player. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I fully understand why taking an elite DE or w/e would not be a bad pick and will likely be a better overall pick than any of these bum ass QBs we could take.

That said?  I'll still probably throw some poo and cuss a lot if we do it. Then again the more I think about it the less I think I'll be happy with whoever we pick at 6 so meh.  I'll just get the Huddle Riot Kit ready to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Shotgun said:

Who cares if we pass on 1 blue chip player when we can get 2 (backup) players instead.

 

18 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah. It's ridiculous. 

Just don't fug up #6 and then move on to next season. This is not hard.

Lets say you have 8 players rated in the 60-63 group. Couple teams phone you up and one offers couple later picks plus their 100th pick to move up to 88? Isnt the smart move to take the offer? Once 100 comes you still have 3 players(since no boards are the same) left to pick form the 60-63 group, plus you got 197 and 215. Seems simple to me....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

Lets say you have 8 players rated in the 60-63 group. Couple teams phone you up and one offers couple later picks plus their 100th pick to move up to 88? Isnt the smart move to take the offer? Once 100 comes you still have 3 players(since no boards are the same) left to pick form the 60-63 group, plus you got 197 and 215. Seems simple to me....

I just not a fan of trading picks unless someone is willing to overpay. Especially with first round picks.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shotgun said:

I just not a fan of trading picks unless someone is willing to overpay. Especially with first round picks.  

Jets call the panthers and offer the 10th, 69, and 111 for the 10th pick? Is that enough? I mean personally theres no difference between 6 and 10 in this 2022 rating wise. Ravens, viking, and others can offer there 1st (10-18) picks plus 2nd rounders and late rounders for the 6th.....Why wouldnt you do that if a group of seven players are rated the same? 

I could take a different approach next year. Honestly the meat part of the draft is 4th-UDFA... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Jets call the panthers and offer the 10th, 69, and 111 for the 10th pick? Is that enough? I mean personally theres no difference between 6 and 10 in this 2022 rating wise. Ravens, viking, and others can offer there 1st (10-18) picks plus 2nd rounders and late rounders for the 6th.....Why wouldnt you do that if a group of seven players are rated the same? 

I could take a different approach next year. Honestly the meat part of the draft is 4th-UDFA... 

Depends whos there but no probably not enough.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • EDGE Aidan Hutchinson, Michigan. ...
  •  T Charles Cross, Mississippi State. ...
  •  T Ikem Ekwonu, N.C. State. ...
  • T Evan Neal, Alabama. ...
  • EDGE Kayvon Thibodeaux, Oregon. ...

If all these guys are gone (unlikely) when we pick, I would be more willing to trade back, but I would still want a lot to do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, stbugs said:

The meat of the draft is day 3? How is that possible? You mean there’s no difference in rankings from 33 to 200+?

Also, it seems to me that there’s a chasm from top 6 (If Walker or Willis are graded there) and 10. You seem to have 2-3 tackles, 2-3 DEs and Gardner. After that are QBs that many pundits think aren’t worth before the end of the 1st and guys like Hamilton, Stingley and Penning with lots of questions. Even Cross isn’t universally loved. Pick 69 would have to be an instant starter to make it worth taking a much bigger risk at 10.

No no.....the best highest value is 4th-UDFA. This is maybe the only drat in recent history where Id trade a bunch of 4s, 5s, 6s for a earlier pick. The UDFA group should be the best form the last 10 years. 2nd rounders are still far above the 4th-UDFA group. Just more draft-able players in this years mainly due to coofus effect. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...