Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who’s your ideal ‘trade back’ partner?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ravens are ideal. They are sitting at 14, we can likely get a second and future 3rd

Ravens are a Super Bowl caliber team if BigTruss is healthy and they need to get him a dynamic playmaker. At 6 the Ravens should be able to get G. Wilson from OSU and CAR at 14 are still ahead of NO and PHI

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

Ravens are ideal. They are sitting at 14, we can likely get a second and future 3rd

Ravens are a Super Bowl caliber team if BigTruss is healthy and they need to get him a dynamic playmaker. At 6 the Ravens should be able to get G. Wilson from OSU and CAR at 14 are still ahead of NO and PHI

6 to 14 and only get a mid 2nd and a 3rd?   hard hard pass

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ravens have been mine. They’re great with the mid round picks so I’d suggest their 2nd, one of their 3rds and a future 3rd. 

Houston at 13. They add on pick 37 & 80 at minimum to grab Garrett Wilson. Think there’s some smoke there.

Texans, Ravens, Eagles I can see wanting to trade up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ideally a OT will be there at #6.  They don't trade back. If not...

Heck, trade back to pick #32.   Further back in the 1st you trade down the more you accumulate.  There isn't anyone at 15 that is going to make us drastically better than at 32.   Big difference in trade value chart between the value of 15 and 32. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Packers. #22, #28, and a mid-rounder. They come up for a WR.

Can't trade past pick 17 because Chargers would take the last LT right in front of us. We would have to go with another position, which would be a mistake.  If any of the three top LT's are available at 6 stay put.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would take the giants roster over Panthers. Lawrence, 3 OLB/DEs, Thomas, and nabers. Lawrence is better than dbrown and Thomas is better than icky. Panthers don't have one edge that would start over those 3 not matter how people feel about burns. Id believe....I think I would take nabers over the whole WR group....Id need to think about, but I feel it is right or 50/50..... Now after the top 10, Panthers may have claim. Im just not that big of a NFL fan like past time to make a good case. I'd just take giants on their top talent.    I will say this, if BY carries this team to the playoffs, he alone would flip this. 
    • Looks like he ran out of real estate.  He had 5 total TDs. As good as we have ever seen in Carolina? Looks like he is the only QB in our history with 3 passing and 2 rushing TDs and he tied a single game record of 5 TDs in one game with Cam and Beurlein.  Throw in his 73.4% completions and zero turnovers, literally the ONLY thing you could argue against statistically is total yardage which was only 275.  You may not agree with that statement (not 100% sure I do), but it's really not THAT wild...
    • I have for too long lacked giving good posting beers, fire, etc.  Good post, its beyond prove it time and until then 30s is where they belong. 
×
×
  • Create New...