Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers likely drafting a QB


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I just think his physical limitations are going to be too much to overcome. Great small college QB who was fun as hell to watch at that level but I just think the ball is in the air too long at the NFL level.

Same here.  I think it would be basically a wasted pick.  Keep building the line IMO.

 

I just dont see any way they can put together a package to get mid 2nd to grab a qb.  Robbie, next years 3rd and 4rth?   But lets be real thats not going to be enough.   Darnold is fuging us yet again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Short to intermediate level accuracy is more valuable in our scheme than a big arm.

But you have to be able to threaten downfield. If the entire D is squatting on everything because they no you can't attack deep then there's no room to work underneath. There has to be the threat of attacking deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Paradis was coming off of a serious injury though. That was my big hang up on him.

I think his suckitude had less to do with his injury. I think he was just the product of being in a good unit.

The parallel with Bozeman being that a good team opted to NOT sign him, so I am not getting my hopes up about that move like others are. 

Maybe these guys will work out but we are batting an unbelievably low percentage for our offseason free agent signings under Fitt/Rhule, so color me extremely skeptical until proven otherwise.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

But you have to be able to threaten downfield. If the entire D is squatting on everything because they no you can't attack deep then there's no room to work underneath. There has to be the threat of attacking deep.

I'd agree, but some people's definition of "deep" is a little extreme.

You don't have to be able to throw it 50 or 60 yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, t96 said:

Note he said there's "absolutely a chance" it's a trade back in tonight for a Willis/Howell type, but also could be a day 3 prospect too.

Honesty after everything with the QB’s, I’m fine with Howell for the right price. But make no mistake, we do not need to be betting the farm on any of these guys.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I think his suckitude had less to do with his injury. I think he was just the product of being in a good unit.

The parallel with Bozeman being that a good team opted to NOT sign him, so I am not getting my hopes up about that move like others are. 

Maybe these guys will work out but we are batting an unbelievably low percentage for our offseason free agent signings under Fitt/Rhule, so color me extremely skeptical until proven otherwise.

Oh, I think it had a LOT to do with the injury. He was a road grader in Denver. He noticeably lacked playing strength here. He was a different player. Like comparing Cam's arm before the Watt hit and after. It was dramatic.

Not just that but he was agile as hell. Look at this.

Paradis-Reach.gif

He simply could not physically do that after that hip injury. That was a gigantic hole and a big gain in Denver and it was all because of Paradis. CMC gets hit two yards behind the LOS here if we ask Paradis to attempt to replicate that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stbugs said:

SMH. I don’t know why you guys are so optimistic about this. With pick 137 as our best pick, a QB in the 2nd basically means we lose our 2023 draft pick and that should be a non-starter. There’s an almost certainty that the QB we could get with next year’s first is a better talent than a QB we trade it for this year.

No way we trade next year's first for a 2nd rounder lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I think his suckitude had less to do with his injury. I think he was just the product of being in a good unit.

The parallel with Bozeman being that a good team opted to NOT sign him, so I am not getting my hopes up about that move like others are. 

Maybe these guys will work out but we are batting an unbelievably low percentage for our offseason free agent signings under Fitt/Rhule, so color me extremely skeptical until proven otherwise.

Fair to be skeptical, especially considering who's still running things.  But there was a clear effort to upgrade this line and they surprised me with who they brought in.  

I remember suggesting both Corbett and Bozeman before official FA started and was laughed at saying to look at the mid-level or low tier level guys.  Now to peg them as JAGs when they were perceived as two of the better FA IOLs available this offseason is something I'll go to bat for.  Corbett may have had the luxury of playing around all-pros, so that could be the Paradis effect, but that's not the case with Bozeman.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Oh, I think it had a LOT to do with the injury. He was a road grader in Denver. He noticeably lacked playing strength here. He was a different player. Like comparing Cam's arm before the Watt hit and after. It was dramatic.

Not just that but he was agile as hell. Look at this.

Paradis-Reach.gif

He simply could not physically do that after that hip injury. That was a gigantic hole and a big gain in Denver and it was all because of Paradis. CMC gets hit two yards behind the LOS here if we ask Paradis to attempt to replicate that.

He was still agile here but he was getting  ragdolled. IMO, he just wasn't used the same way as he was in Denver. He didn't really get worse as much as he wasn't set up for success here. 

Which is why I am not getting my hopes up for Bozeman. TBD if he is actually any good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Fitterer doesn't strike me as a guy who cares about "excitement".

He wants to build a winning foundation, and he's talked about how to do that.

Tepper does.   End of the day it is the entertainement business.  And Carolina does have a PR issue and excitement issue right now.  

Which is why I have always felt confident they wouldn't be able to just walk away from this draft with just 1 pick in 3 rounds.  They got nothing to sell the fans.  Nothing.  No hope.  Everything in that building knows how they are viewed.   And we know they know.  

Smartest move IMO isn't mortaging future picks (with potentitally a HC that might not see another year) to grab a QB in a weak class.   Carolina says a lot of stuff.  There actions to date haven't been the team that wants to slowly and traditionally build this thing from the ground up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...