Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers likely drafting a QB


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I just think his physical limitations are going to be too much to overcome. Great small college QB who was fun as hell to watch at that level but I just think the ball is in the air too long at the NFL level.

Same here.  I think it would be basically a wasted pick.  Keep building the line IMO.

 

I just dont see any way they can put together a package to get mid 2nd to grab a qb.  Robbie, next years 3rd and 4rth?   But lets be real thats not going to be enough.   Darnold is fuging us yet again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Short to intermediate level accuracy is more valuable in our scheme than a big arm.

But you have to be able to threaten downfield. If the entire D is squatting on everything because they no you can't attack deep then there's no room to work underneath. There has to be the threat of attacking deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Paradis was coming off of a serious injury though. That was my big hang up on him.

I think his suckitude had less to do with his injury. I think he was just the product of being in a good unit.

The parallel with Bozeman being that a good team opted to NOT sign him, so I am not getting my hopes up about that move like others are. 

Maybe these guys will work out but we are batting an unbelievably low percentage for our offseason free agent signings under Fitt/Rhule, so color me extremely skeptical until proven otherwise.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

But you have to be able to threaten downfield. If the entire D is squatting on everything because they no you can't attack deep then there's no room to work underneath. There has to be the threat of attacking deep.

I'd agree, but some people's definition of "deep" is a little extreme.

You don't have to be able to throw it 50 or 60 yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, t96 said:

Note he said there's "absolutely a chance" it's a trade back in tonight for a Willis/Howell type, but also could be a day 3 prospect too.

Honesty after everything with the QB’s, I’m fine with Howell for the right price. But make no mistake, we do not need to be betting the farm on any of these guys.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I think his suckitude had less to do with his injury. I think he was just the product of being in a good unit.

The parallel with Bozeman being that a good team opted to NOT sign him, so I am not getting my hopes up about that move like others are. 

Maybe these guys will work out but we are batting an unbelievably low percentage for our offseason free agent signings under Fitt/Rhule, so color me extremely skeptical until proven otherwise.

Oh, I think it had a LOT to do with the injury. He was a road grader in Denver. He noticeably lacked playing strength here. He was a different player. Like comparing Cam's arm before the Watt hit and after. It was dramatic.

Not just that but he was agile as hell. Look at this.

Paradis-Reach.gif

He simply could not physically do that after that hip injury. That was a gigantic hole and a big gain in Denver and it was all because of Paradis. CMC gets hit two yards behind the LOS here if we ask Paradis to attempt to replicate that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stbugs said:

SMH. I don’t know why you guys are so optimistic about this. With pick 137 as our best pick, a QB in the 2nd basically means we lose our 2023 draft pick and that should be a non-starter. There’s an almost certainty that the QB we could get with next year’s first is a better talent than a QB we trade it for this year.

No way we trade next year's first for a 2nd rounder lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I think his suckitude had less to do with his injury. I think he was just the product of being in a good unit.

The parallel with Bozeman being that a good team opted to NOT sign him, so I am not getting my hopes up about that move like others are. 

Maybe these guys will work out but we are batting an unbelievably low percentage for our offseason free agent signings under Fitt/Rhule, so color me extremely skeptical until proven otherwise.

Fair to be skeptical, especially considering who's still running things.  But there was a clear effort to upgrade this line and they surprised me with who they brought in.  

I remember suggesting both Corbett and Bozeman before official FA started and was laughed at saying to look at the mid-level or low tier level guys.  Now to peg them as JAGs when they were perceived as two of the better FA IOLs available this offseason is something I'll go to bat for.  Corbett may have had the luxury of playing around all-pros, so that could be the Paradis effect, but that's not the case with Bozeman.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Oh, I think it had a LOT to do with the injury. He was a road grader in Denver. He noticeably lacked playing strength here. He was a different player. Like comparing Cam's arm before the Watt hit and after. It was dramatic.

Not just that but he was agile as hell. Look at this.

Paradis-Reach.gif

He simply could not physically do that after that hip injury. That was a gigantic hole and a big gain in Denver and it was all because of Paradis. CMC gets hit two yards behind the LOS here if we ask Paradis to attempt to replicate that.

He was still agile here but he was getting  ragdolled. IMO, he just wasn't used the same way as he was in Denver. He didn't really get worse as much as he wasn't set up for success here. 

Which is why I am not getting my hopes up for Bozeman. TBD if he is actually any good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Fitterer doesn't strike me as a guy who cares about "excitement".

He wants to build a winning foundation, and he's talked about how to do that.

Tepper does.   End of the day it is the entertainement business.  And Carolina does have a PR issue and excitement issue right now.  

Which is why I have always felt confident they wouldn't be able to just walk away from this draft with just 1 pick in 3 rounds.  They got nothing to sell the fans.  Nothing.  No hope.  Everything in that building knows how they are viewed.   And we know they know.  

Smartest move IMO isn't mortaging future picks (with potentitally a HC that might not see another year) to grab a QB in a weak class.   Carolina says a lot of stuff.  There actions to date haven't been the team that wants to slowly and traditionally build this thing from the ground up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Boy we agree on the dink and dunk. I don’t want to watch that kind of football.  I mean okay if you win with it, it could be tolerable but it feels claustrophobic, constrained, limited, boring.  But for some reason I love a smash mouth heavy run game that wins the LOS and gets the backs to the second level.  
    • I am really sorry  that  happened to you they say to never meet your sports heroes i have friends who met  mickey mantle when they were young and he was a belligerent alcoholic at the time  ut broke their hearts  I had the opportunity to meet and spend  time with Cam Newton.     He was the polar opposite of Steve Smith and his public image.   Polite.  Honest when asked question.  You could tell the things that mattered to him and the things that  didnt. The disappointments in himself and the things that hurt him  those qualities make him quite a good interviewer too  i genuinely liked him   Im sure as young, rich, sports hero, he has not been a choir boy but there is goodness in him  the time i met him i took one of my friends with me from the west coast. She said she didn't like him and wasn’t enthusiastic about meeting him.  She left loving him   No one can say anything bad about ‘her Cam’ anymore 
    • Agree about oline. They've tried their best to improve that area. But honestly, has it looked like the most expensive oline in the NFL to you? Not just with Bryce. With Dalton's one game where they almost got the old man killed.  Also YAC shouldn't always be hitting a guy in stride while he's running full speed. Pickens killed us after the catch and those weren't all hit-in-stride plays. I remember a play in Miami when a guy caught a 5 yards curl and took it like 30-40 yards to the house. We don't have that in Carolina. Horn might be the closest thing to that but he can't get significant PT for whatever reason. If Bryce keeps trusting his receivers to make plays, I think he'll become more consistent. Seemed like he only trusted TMac. And force feeding one receiver isn't sustainable. Defenses will start to blanket him and take him out of the game. And yeah, keep taking deep shots. I hate all that dink and dunk football. Hate it. 
×
×
  • Create New...