Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Rhule really think he has 5 years?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

Guaranteed it's a closer representation to you and I would be willing to put money on it. I can dig up random nerds on Google as well but I will just ask again... When are you posting up pics of yourself "bro"?  It might take you a bit to respond today as I'm sure you are bench pressing at the gym right after you drag race your Lambo around your mansion grounds. Don't let us bother you though Hercules. 

 

This you bro?

silence of the lambs GIF

 

 

hey at the end of the day im just on a message board talking poo.  its fun. I don't claim to be Mr. Awesome

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

Maybe Ron did inherit a slightly better mess.  That’s not really the point.  Singling out Ron.  . Capers, Fox and Ron all inherited comparable messes…..and weren’t jokes at the conclusion of year 2.   There was something being built.  Direction.  Improvement.   Belief.  

and I do agree that Rhule wouldn’t be married into a mindset like a Spurrier, Kelly, etc.   I mean there innovation is what got them the jobs though and to see them give it a whirl at the next level.    So I don’t think they compare well to Rhule. 

But it just brings me back to what are waiting on Rhule to show at this level?  What’s the NFL equivalent of his college success?   

I'm not so sure Rhule didn't approach last year to married to a mindset of his "program/system."  One would hope the results (or lack thereof) would have opened his mind a bit, but the jury is still out on that, too.

I'm not looking for or expecting a run to the NFCC this year.  I think 2021's regression killed any realistic expectations of a deep playoff run.  My own expectation is we show respectability.  I'm not putting a hard number of wins on that, but more than 5.  We have to show we can get to the next level, which is somewhere around .500 and not causing laughter when somebody points out we are mathematically in the playoff picture around Thanksgiving. 

Last year we were 5-6 at Thanksgiving, and technically in the playoff hunt.  But the ER's probably treated more people for swallowing bones when that was said as they did people making "strategic errors" trying to deep fry their turkey.  Hopefully we don't send people to the ER choking this year until Christmas.

In other words, my bar for this year is we achieve what we should have achieved last year.  If Rhule can't do that, then I think the NFL is just not his gig. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CRA said:

No, this is just you making up a bad take and projecting it out…..because you have chosen to take a stand on a bad hill in regards to Rhule.  Capers, Fox and Ron all came into bad situations just like Rhule.   Rhule is only unique in the fact he hasn’t done diddly.  

 

Capers had a Supplemental Draft to go along with getting Collins at pick #2. Capers won with Collins, and lost a lot without him.

 

Fox had a decent team, then found Jake. Fox won a lot with Jake, and not so much without him.

 

Rivera had a decent team for Cam to lead. RR had Cam and had some success until Cam fell apart. No so many wins without him.

 

Rhule had no talent, and no QB. But you think that is the same situation. lol

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CRA said:

Maybe Ron did inherit a slightly better mess.  That’s not really the point.  Singling out Ron.  . Capers, Fox and Ron all inherited comparable messes…..and weren’t jokes at the conclusion of year 2.   There was something being built.  Direction.  Improvement.   Belief.  

and I do agree that Rhule wouldn’t be married into a mindset like a Spurrier, Kelly, etc.   I mean there innovation is what got them the jobs though and to see them give it a whirl at the next level.    So I don’t think they compare well to Rhule. 

But it just brings me back to what are waiting on Rhule to show at this level?  What’s the NFL equivalent of his college success?   

The NFL equivalent would be building a team good enough to make the playoffs, but not good enough to beat anyone once they get there. Then he hauls ass to the next program. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Huddler said:

some of yall are trying to compensate for something.. 🤔

 

gotta feel better about yourself somehow i guess.  gotta get that huddle fame baby!! 

You can't be talking about me.  I have an ex-wife and a current wife.  My motto is "I exist therefore I am wrong."

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

16 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Capers had a Supplemental Draft to go along with getting Collins at pick #2. Capers won with Collins, and lost a lot without him.

 

Fox had a decent team, then found Jake. Fox won a lot with Jake, and not so much without him.

 

Rivera had a decent team for Cam to lead. RR had Cam and had some success until Cam fell apart. No so many wins without him.

 

Rhule had no talent, and no QB. But you think that is the same situation. lol

Fox took over a 1-15 Chris Weinke Panthers that was coming off a 15 game losing streak. 


Rhule inherited 

Cam -was talented enough to win 7 games with the worst roster in the NFL.   More importantly, his franchise best leadership to get whatever you wanted up and running.   Rhule opted to kick him to the curb.   

CMC -  best RB in the NFL

DJ Moore - was already sleeping walking to 1000+ yards with no QB play 

plus a bunch of young recently talented guys like Burns, Moton, Samuel, Jackson, Shaq

Offensively, Matt Rhule inherited a better gig than Fox did. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rayzor said:

And some are rewriting history to fit their narrative that Rhule isn't as bad as he has proven himself to be.

Nahh.  Rhule still sucks atm.  You are what your record says you are.  Tepper has decided to give him time to turn it around.  We'll see.  

That doesn't mean RR inherited a similar situation to Rhule.  He just didn't.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

 

Fox took over a 1-15 Chris Weinke Panthers that was coming off a 15 game losing streak. 


Rhule inherited 

Cam -was talented enough to win 7 games with the worst roster in the NFL.   More importantly, his franchise best leadership to get whatever you wanted up and running. 

CMC -  best RB in the NFL

DJ Moore - was already sleeping walking to 1000+ yards with no QB play 

plus a bunch of young recently talented guys like Burns, Moton, Samuel.   

Offensively, Matt Rhule inherited a better gig than Fox did. 

 

 

I said everything I needed to say in my last post. You can rearrange it any way you choose. You usually do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Sometimes a change of scenery works.  It wouldn't be the first time a HC failed his first time out and later went on to success.  

I don't this is the guy. Would prefer to not lean into being the new Browns if we can Rhule. We are already trying to outsuck them as it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not especially interested in McAdoo as a head coach.

There'll certainly be candidates this year. Heck, the Packers OC might be one of them again.

Yeah, if we are stuck with existing staff I'd probably rather give Wilks another shot than McAdoo.

Would rather just open it up and let Fitterer and the FO make a hire. At the bare minimum if they fug that up royally, we can just get rid of Fitt and start that process again too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...