Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Steve Reed reports "the Panthers are still interested in" Jimmy Garoppolo


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

To quote the inimitable Sgt. Joe Friday...

..."just the facts, ma'am"... 😎👊

2015 > 5-11

2016 > 2-14

2017 > 1-10 w/o Jimmy G.

2018 > 3-10 w/o Jimmy G.

2020 > 3-7 w/o Jimmy G.

'17/'18/'20 > 7-27 (.206) w/o Jimmy G.

'17/'18/'20 > 9-6 (.600) w/ Jimmy G.

'19/'21 > 27-12 (.692) w/ Jimmy G. fully available, includes a Super Bowl and 2 NFC Championship games, as well as multiple playoff wins against Whiny Aaron.

Jimmy G. is the epitome of a difference maker...

...the anti-Darnold if you will -- Panthers could use a some of that 💥👊...

Los Angeles Rams Reaction GIF by Red Bull

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

To quote the inimitable Sgt. Joe Friday...

..."just the facts, ma'am"... 😎👊

2015 > 5-11

2016 > 2-14

2017 > 1-10 w/o Jimmy G.

2018 > 3-10 w/o Jimmy G.

2020 > 3-7 w/o Jimmy G.

'17/'18/'20 > 7-27 (.206) w/o Jimmy G.

'17/'18/'20 > 9-6 (.600) w/ Jimmy G.

'19/'21 > 27-12 (.692) w/ Jimmy G. fully available, includes a Super Bowl and 2 NFC Championship games, as well as multiple playoff wins against Whiny Aaron.

Jimmy G. is the epitome of a difference maker...

...the anti-Darnold if you will -- Panthers could use a some of that 💣💥...

Lol, it’s bad enough that you can’t display critical thinking to just post WINZ WINZ WINZ like it’s literally only the two QBs on the opposing sides of the field who are playing one on one in football, but now you are posting those stats from years before Shanahan even coached the niners. 

🙄💩🤥🤡🤦‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, X-Clown said:

Lol, it’s bad enough that you can’t display critical thinking to just post WINZ WINZ WINZ like it’s literally only the two QBs on the opposing sides of the field who are playing one on one in football, but now you are posting those stats from years before Shanahan even coached the niners. 

🙄💩🤥🤡🤦‍♂️

Kenjon Barner has 3 Super Bowl rings. Clearly need to bring him in to upgrade the RB position.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

 

Jimmy G. is the epitome of a difference maker...

the key to great trolling is for people to largely think you might be serious.  You generally do a good job.  now you are just getting lazy.   This is C- grade troll work. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, CRA said:

the key to great trolling is for people to largely think you might be serious.  You generally do a good job.  now you are just getting lazy.   This is C- grade troll work. 

I have expressed no personal opinion in any way, shape, or form...

...simply listed The Jimmy-G Man's records/accomplishments...

...as the inimitable Bill Parcells said -- "you are what your record says you are"... 🤙.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well then I guess David Tepper is an absolute loser.

Under his leadership, the Panthers can't even reach a 500 season.

He will ignore this point. I’ve brought it up twice and he just pretends like it doesn’t exist because his ONLY point that makes Jimmy G great makes his beloved Tepper look bad. What a dilemma for Sizzle…

Also PJ Walker has quite the record as a starter, and you are what your record is…

Edited by ForJimmy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

...as the inimitable Bill Parcells said -- "you are what your record says you are"... 🤙.

 

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well then I guess David Tepper is an absolute loser.

Under his leadership, the Panthers can't even reach a 500 season.

My goodness that backfired on ol' SizzleBuzz.

200.gif

GIF by Saturday Night Live

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Barner doesn't hardly touch the ball. A little different than a starting QB

And a QB is hardly the only player driving wins and losses. That as a flagship reason to get a QB is as nonsensical as my comment about Barner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well then I guess David Tepper is an absolute loser.

Under his leadership, the Panthers can't even reach a 500 season.

It takes time to turn around a complex business organization like an NFL team (a point clearly lost on you 🤦‍♂️).

In baseball parlance we are in the top of the 2nd inning with no outs and a 2-2 count…

…get back to me during the 7th inning stretch on Big Tepp’s “record” 🤣👊.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

It takes time to turn around a complex business organization like an NFL team (a point clearly lost on you 🤦‍♂️).

In baseball parlance we are in the top of the 2nd inning with no outs and a 2-2 count…

…get back to me during the 7th inning stretch on Big Tepp’s “record” 🤣👊.

Plenty of teams have produced winning programs in less time.

"You are what your record says you are" was your standard.

By that standard (again, as applied by you) David Tepper is, after four years under his watch, a sh-tty owner. No amount of attempted spin will change that.

I'd guess that he might not like hearing that you consider him terrible at his job.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I have expressed no personal opinion in any way, shape, or form...

...simply listed The Jimmy-G Man's records/accomplishments...

...as the inimitable Bill Parcells said -- "you are what your record says you are"... 🤙.

Parcels was saying that about the team, not specifically the quarterback. Which is hilarious given how much you love to prop up Matt Rhule and ignore his record which speaks pretty loudly about who he is.
 

By your definition, Matthew Stafford’s career record with the Lions of 74-90-1 means that he’s a loser. I wonder why the Rams decided to trade for him since their previous QB had a much better winning record of 42-27 with a Super Bowl appearance and other playoff appearances. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

Parcels was saying that about the team, not specifically the quarterback. Which is hilarious given how much you love to prop up Matt Rhule and ignore his record which speaks pretty loudly about who he is.
 

By your definition, Matthew Stafford’s career record with the Lions of 74-90-1 means that he’s a loser. I wonder why the Rams decided to trade for him since their previous QB had a much better winning record of 42-27 with a Super Bowl appearance and other playoff appearances. 

lol 

Sizzle logic 

Jared Goff is a game changer 

Matt Stafford is a bum 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...