Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ben McAdoo Presser


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MasterAwesome said:

Why dwell on his team's offensive performance while he was HC though?  It's not an apples-to-apples comparison; we want to evaluate McAdoo's performance as an OC since that's the role he's serving here.  It's logical to think, as HC, he was much more hands-off with his offense than while he was the OC where that'd be his sole focus.

I think a more apt comparison is to look at the Giants' offense before and after he was brought on as OC.  In 2013 (the year before McAdoo was brought on as OC), the Giants ranked 28th in yardage and 28th in points.  In 2014 in McAdoo's first year as OC, the Giants ranked 10th in yardage and 13th in points.  In 2015 in McAdoo's second (and final) year as OC, the Giants ranked 6th in points and 8th in yardage.  That's a pretty good track record as OC, although fairly limited.  I think we can all agree he was a failure as a HC and if Rhule gets fired and McAdoo takes his place full-time (beyond an interim role), I'm gonna be just as disappointed as most everyone else here.

McAdoo was also the playcaller when has the HC too.  So it can't be totally disregarded.  He called the plays his entire first year as HC.   He called them to start his 2nd year as HC too.  He got a lot of heat for the playcalling as HC and being too predictable.   Running the same plays over and over. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 4Corners said:

Wow nice lettuce, Ben. You look like a 50 year old JTT with type 2 diabetes and just overcame a porn addiction 

Okay, post up your pics so we can analyze yours if we are playing that game. On another note, i bet you wouldn't say it to his face if you ever ran into him.

Over It Eye Roll GIF

Edited by YourLastThought
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mac took the 28th-highest-scoring offense in 2013  to 13th in 2014. In 2015, they  became the 6th.  In 2016, his first year as HC they went 11-5 and went to the playoffs. 

OBJ and a bunch of other guys got injured in 2017, and they royally sucked when they were expected for a deep playoff run.  Eli was benched for Geno, snapping Eli's  record for consecutive games, and there was talk of Eli leaving.  After that, they fired Mac  going 2-10 that year.

Mac has been a very successful OC, something Brady NEVER was.   Most of the HC heat was losing games and benching a beloved QB.   The "being too predictable" thing was last year's Panthers entire offensive playbook.  Robbie and multiple opposing CB's literally said it out loud. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, CRA said:

McAdoo was also the playcaller when has the HC too.  So it can't be totally disregarded.  He called the plays his entire first year as HC.   He called them to start his 2nd year as HC too.  He got a lot of heat for the playcalling as HC and being too predictable.   Running the same plays over and over. 

 

 

Sure we can't "totally disregard" it.  But I mean you have to see the flaws in comparing *HC w/ playcalling duties Ben McAdoo* to *OC Ben McAdoo* though, right?  I think by far the simplest and most rational explanation is that first-time HC Ben McAdoo had way too much on his plate in learning to be a head coach while choosing to maintain playcalling duties.  It takes a lot of experience to be a head coach and playcaller without one or both of those roles suffering as a result.  McAdoo clearly did not have that experience and it was foolish of him to try and juggle both full-time roles.

The alternative is that McAdoo came into a 28th ranked offense, transformed it into the 13th ranked offense in his first year as OC, further solidified it into the 6th ranked offense in his second year as OC, then just somehow forgot how to Offense in his third year with the Giants when he just so happened to coincidentally transition into his role as their head coach. 

Besides, considering you're a big fan of Joe Brady, then you should be really damn excited for McAdoo's offense if it's being characterized as "too predictable" and "running the same plays over and over" lol.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Sure we can't "totally disregard" it.  But I mean you have to see the flaws in comparing *HC w/ playcalling duties Ben McAdoo* to *OC Ben McAdoo* though, right?  I think by far the simplest and most rational explanation is that first-time HC Ben McAdoo had way too much on his plate in learning to be a head coach while choosing to maintain playcalling duties.  It takes a lot of experience to be a head coach and playcaller without one or both of those roles suffering as a result.  McAdoo clearly did not have that experience and it was foolish of him to try and juggle both full-time roles.

The alternative is that McAdoo came into a 28th ranked offense, transformed it into the 13th ranked offense in his first year as OC, further solidified it into the 6th ranked offense in his second year as OC, then just somehow forgot how to Offense in his third year with the Giants when he just so happened to coincidentally transition into his role as their head coach. 

Besides, considering you're a big fan of Joe Brady, then you should be really damn excited for McAdoo's offense if it's being characterized as "too predictable" and "running the same plays over and over" lol.

Well, I guess there is one more question to ask….how involved was Tom Coughlin in the playcalling when McAdoo was OC.  A long time stable NFL offensive guy.   How much of a factor was that Coughlin in making the McAdoo pure OC years okay…..vs McAdoo being blasted as a horrible playcaller as HC.

probably a mix of a lot things IMO.   Not sure taking on too much as a HC fully explains how bad his playcalling was received as HC. 

but in his defense, I guess we could factor in the NY market being the most brutal that exists too.   So they could of come at him harder than what he deserved 

*Rhule shouldn’t of hired Brady.   A team that hired him would have needed to put a green OC like that in a position to succeed and grow. And take lumps.  And nothing about year 2 was about that.    Joe Brady is only relevant in the context of the big picture mismanagement of the O.  And I simply refuse to allow him to the catch all for everyone else’s blunders in the mess.  They need to own there part in it.  And a lot of that is simply on Matt Rhule.  He hired a newb passing OC and gave him Sam Darnold, a bad OL, and basically no legit NFL mentorship to help lol.   The problem wasn’t so much Joe Brady but the architect of it all IMO. That’s designed to fail and predictably did just that. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, CRA said:

Well, I guess there is one more question to ask….how involved was Tom Coughlin in the playcalling when McAdoo was OC.  

Coughlin was hands off. 

This is the Ben McAdoo show. It's his offense, and Giants coach Tom Coughlin is going to let his new coordinator handle the heavy lifting during the game.  "If he needs any help, I'm here," Coughlin said. "I've been a play-caller. To be honest, I never liked anyone interrupting me. "

BTW Coughlin was HC in 2013 when the O was ranked 28th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, poundaway said:

  Most of the HC heat was losing games and benching a beloved QB.   The "being too predictable" thing was last year's Panthers entire offensive playbook.  Robbie and multiple opposing CB's literally said it out loud. 

I mean McAdoo coached in NY.  It’s pretty well documented his predictable playcalling while HC was one of the primary narratives.

I mean you can debate the why it was what it was….but to act like that wasn’t a McAdoo issue is just revisionist storytelling.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

Rhule is still getting used to talking to adults.

Rhule just seems soo nervous, like hes at court-energy. 2 Mccados interview- calm, gives the reporters enough crumbs to write a story but not too much. Answers like hes heard the question 50 times before, but doesnt give rude answers. I see why/how he won over the NYG area.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...