Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Watson's people expecting a full season suspension


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

That would never hold up in Court. They cannot leave a punishment "open ended" and if they did, lawsuits would be filed by both Watson and the NFLPA. There are structures for suspensions and I doubt any of them say "12 games, but we will play the rest by ear". Leaving is open ended incentivizes new allegations that may not necessarily be true, either. I know false accusations occur rarely but if there was a case that would get them, it would be this. 

Which is why the Exempt List is the best option. It's open ended and completely under the Commissioner's conrol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Interesting to see if this delays any outcome in the disciplinary hearings starting tomorrow. The timing seems not coincidental

It isn't.

One of the reasons the NFL wants an indefinite suspension is just in case "but wait, there's more" happens again.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Apparently the four remaining lawsuits could surge back up to ten...

 

Is anyone here a lawyer? Is any of this actually an offense that can be tried, and won, in Civil Court? I can't think of any statutes covered by what is claimed to have happened in all but, I believe one of these cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

Left a wet spot? Guys leave...wet spots now?

sure we can! It's called pre cum. also known as:

dogwater

dribble before you shoot

postcum

preek

mscherry

mooki

premen

love gravy

mouse's tear

cumless nutt

snawggle

cold shorts

snawggle juice

gettin jizzy with it

cowper's fluid

cockchalk

prejuice

stringers

pull out

spunkbubbles

nageek

whiskey dick

Montana potato

cock slobber

ejact

aftercum

bonersauce

cock diaper

meat jousting

salty warning

milkbull

baby oil

precumdensation

cream

instamoist

paplicar

prechup

gooning

a tear of disappointment

and throbulent

 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PizzaTheHutt said:

sure we can! It's called pre cum. also known as:

dogwater

dribble before you shoot

postcum

preek

mscherry

mooki

premen

love gravy

mouse's tear

cumless nutt

snawggle

cold shorts

snawggle juice

gettin jizzy with it

cowper's fluid

cockchalk

prejuice

stringers

pull out

spunkbubbles

nageek

whiskey dick

Montana potato

cock slobber

ejact

aftercum

bonersauce

cock diaper

meat jousting

salty warning

milkbull

baby oil

precumdensation

cream

instamoist

paplicar

prechup

gooning

a tear of disappointment

and throbulent

 

This guy pre's

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...