Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Add sexual assault to the Dan Snyder allegations


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Riverboat Ron said:

They’ll probably just try to turn the narrative to her breaking the NDA and say she’s untrustworthy because she broke a legally binding agreement, ignoring the fact of the sexual assault.

Not so sure about that.

If the NFL wants Snyder gone (and there's plenty of evidence to suggest they do) then he's gonna have a rough time making this go away.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

So what are the expectations on "NDA's"...

...should ladies who have accepted a large cash-payments in lieu of signing an "NDA" and agreed to keep their mouth shut...

...be required to live up to the legally binding agreement they committed to?

Or not?

Can we get you to sign an NDA to stop posting here 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

So what are the expectations on "NDA's"...

...should ladies who have accepted a large cash-payments in lieu of signing an "NDA" and agreed to keep their mouth shut...

...be required to live up to the legally binding agreement they committed to?

Or not?

Good grief. Does your billionaire simping know no bounds?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Good grief. Does your billionaire simping know no bounds?

Actually, what I'm getting at is...

...should the 20 ladies who are entering into NDA's with Mr. Whip-It-Out expected to live up to their contractual obligations in return for the cash payments they will collect?

Or, once they collect the cash are they free to violate the legally-binding contract they signed and go on and spill the goods publicly?

What say ye?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Actually, what I'm getting at is...

...should the 20 ladies who are entering into NDA's with Mr. Whip-It-Out expected to live up to their contractual obligations in return for the cash payments they will collect?

Or, once they collect the cash are they free to violate the legally-binding contract they signed and go on and spill the goods publicly?

What say ye?

They are subject to legal ramifications in some situations such as, say, blasting on a media platform for no purpose other than for defamation. That can include monetary.

But it’s not that simple. NDAs are not some sort of top secret kept until death issuance no one has a right to. NDA’s are a ‘private contract’ and are not exempt from the law. They aren’t exempt from a judge. The information is not even exempt from lawyers. They especially, aren’t exempt when similar behavior branches out into other, similar, separate crimes. Even if unrelated. 

NDAs can be ordered to be disclosed under a variety of conditions and what the media does with it, should they be able to obtain the information, is not in the control of the designee or parties of the NDA.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If only those guys grew on trees? The 2015 team was really special.  That was such an incredible year until the Super Bowl. What happened was the owner let the football people handle football decisions.  We had a front office that made some really good decisions.  Just hit on FAs and draft picks at a high level.  Those guys became GREAT players.  Our head coach held the team to a standard, but allowed them to be themselves.  That let so many of those guys grow into vocal leaders and tone setters.  Then we had Cam play lights out for the entire year.  We had a defense led by Luke, one of the best to ever play.  We had guys like Greg and TD who were so smart and tenacious. That was a special team.  The biggest question is how do we bring that back?  We don't because we can't.  Instead, we need to build up the team again.  Bryce is not Cam, duh.  Maybe he's not even the guy next season.  But there are some dudes like DB, Horn, Chubba who are all high character, effort productive players. As team, they need to lean into what they do well, and give Bryce his opportunities to prove himself.  If not, you keep building the best team and work on that QB.
    • Miami Dolphins owner Stephen Ross was less than thrilled after the Miami Dolphins lost against the Carolina Panthers on Sunday, 27-24, dropping their record to 1-4 on the season. "He was really frustrated, just like I was," head coach Mike McDaniel told reporters Monday. "We talked about the challenge ahead to get ready for the Los Angeles Chargers, and that was really the extent of it." https://bleacherreport.com/articles/25257873-mike-mcdaniel-admits-dolphins-owner-was-really-frustrated-after-loss-panthers
×
×
  • Create New...