Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Add sexual assault to the Dan Snyder allegations

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 minutes ago, Riverboat Ron said:

They’ll probably just try to turn the narrative to her breaking the NDA and say she’s untrustworthy because she broke a legally binding agreement, ignoring the fact of the sexual assault.

Not so sure about that.

If the NFL wants Snyder gone (and there's plenty of evidence to suggest they do) then he's gonna have a rough time making this go away.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
4Corners Grand Master

4Corners

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

So what are the expectations on "NDA's"...

...should ladies who have accepted a large cash-payments in lieu of signing an "NDA" and agreed to keep their mouth shut...

...be required to live up to the legally binding agreement they committed to?

Or not?

Can we get you to sign an NDA to stop posting here 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

So what are the expectations on "NDA's"...

...should ladies who have accepted a large cash-payments in lieu of signing an "NDA" and agreed to keep their mouth shut...

...be required to live up to the legally binding agreement they committed to?

Or not?

Good grief. Does your billionaire simping know no bounds?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Good grief. Does your billionaire simping know no bounds?

Actually, what I'm getting at is...

...should the 20 ladies who are entering into NDA's with Mr. Whip-It-Out expected to live up to their contractual obligations in return for the cash payments they will collect?

Or, once they collect the cash are they free to violate the legally-binding contract they signed and go on and spill the goods publicly?

What say ye?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Actually, what I'm getting at is...

...should the 20 ladies who are entering into NDA's with Mr. Whip-It-Out expected to live up to their contractual obligations in return for the cash payments they will collect?

Or, once they collect the cash are they free to violate the legally-binding contract they signed and go on and spill the goods publicly?

What say ye?

They are subject to legal ramifications in some situations such as, say, blasting on a media platform for no purpose other than for defamation. That can include monetary.

But it’s not that simple. NDAs are not some sort of top secret kept until death issuance no one has a right to. NDA’s are a ‘private contract’ and are not exempt from the law. They aren’t exempt from a judge. The information is not even exempt from lawyers. They especially, aren’t exempt when similar behavior branches out into other, similar, separate crimes. Even if unrelated. 

NDAs can be ordered to be disclosed under a variety of conditions and what the media does with it, should they be able to obtain the information, is not in the control of the designee or parties of the NDA.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      Our 2nd Most Productive WR

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      I encourage you to go back and watch his college play. Notice how he immediately backpedals to 10 yards behind the LOS on almost every snap. You can't do that in the NFL. Your OTs have no chance of keeping those freak show edge rushers off of you. You can't create a pocket that deep. If you drop back like that in the NFL on a regular basis you're basically on your own. Your OL can't do a whole lot for you. Bryce can chuck it when he has an airport runway in front of him to step up into. There's a reason why "ease of generating velocity" is such a talking point evaluating QBs. It's not how hard or how far you can throw the ball given a perfect situation. It's how hard and how far you can throw the ball in a typical NFL game situation and that's where a lot of my concerns with Bryce were going into the draft. There were way too many plays in his college tape that if you were watching that purely in terms of translating it to the NFL it just didn't work.
    • LinvilleGorge
      cam Newton makes his return to Madden football

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Yeah, like I said I get it. From a revenue perspective I'm not a good customer for them. They've probably intentionally tanked offline franchise mode to try to get people online. Again, not a terrible strategy from a pure business perspective. I can't really be mad at them for doing what's good for business but yeah, from my perspective it still sucks.
    • cranky
      Our 2nd Most Productive WR

      By cranky · Posted

      Ok let me be more specific. Smith was a stud before Newton got here do you not agree? Yes, LaFell improved under Cam but then had his best years after leaving the Panthers with Cam as the QB and going to NE. So he improved playing with someone else. Olsen was in Chicage the year before Cam arrived and statistically had the same numbers his first year with Cam.  Hope that's clearer for you.
×
×
  • Create New...