Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule on practice reps


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

It isn't hard to figure out. It means that his interest is on winning games now so the starters get all the reps. Corrals reps aren't important right now. It isn't bad coaching.  It is teaching a new offense to a bunch of guys allocating reps based on priority. When your job is on the line you don't worry about next year you focus on the present. Once Baker got here the importance of Corral playing right away went way down which was a good thing. I expect if Baker has a good year he will be resigned to a big contract. There will be plenty of time to develop Corral.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I honestly think these guys believe they're going to be able to trade Sam Darnold and giving him more time and reps is going to facilitate that. I think that their belief is very dumb.

Do you really want to deny your 3rd round rookie QB valuable time and reps to maybe get a conditional late round pick while still eating the majority of Darnold's contract? Dumb.

The crucial decision that should have been made weeks ago is who is going to be the backup.  Should have picked Sam or PJ and moved on.  The moment they drafted Matt PJ should have been cut, or at least when Baker was traded for.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

It isn't hard to figure out. It means that his interest is on winning games now so the starters get all the reps. Corrals reps aren't important right now. It isn't bad coaching.  It is teaching a new offense to a bunch of guys allocating reps based on priority. When your job is on the line you don't worry about next year you focus on the present. Once Baker got here the importance of Corral playing right away went way down which was a good thing. I expect if Baker has a good year he will be resigned to a big contract. There will be plenty of time to develop Corral.

The starters are getting all the reps... meanwhile, Mayfield and Darnold are splitting the starter reps. 😂

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

The crucial decision that should have been made weeks ago is who is going to be the backup.  Should have picked Sam or PJ and moved on.  The moment they drafted Matt PJ should have been cut, or at least when Baker was traded for.

This is why I thought Sam would just get flat out cut.  Baker is the obvious #1, PJ is Matt's boy, and we drafted Corral.  Sam Darnold's salary is already a sunk cost, but his practice reps and roster spot are not.  If we needed a warm body at QB to fill out the roster, it makes sense to keep Sam.  We owe him the money either way.  But if he's taking up someone else's reps, the cost of keeping him extends beyond his salary.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I honestly think these guys believe they're going to be able to trade Sam Darnold and giving him more time and reps is going to facilitate that. I think that their belief is very dumb.

Do you really want to deny your 3rd round rookie QB valuable time and reps to maybe get a conditional late round pick while still eating the majority of Darnold's contract? Dumb.

I will ask you the same questions.

 

What in your opinion is the absolute best most realistic trade scenario for darnold?  Lets say 5 qb starters go down in preseason.  Even then a conditional 7th and we eat his contract is the best IMO.

So then ask yourself if that is their thought process of "showcasing" darnold is that worth it for a 7th?  Hell no it wouldnt be worth it assuming we could get a 5th.   RHule is shooting himself in the damn foot for no reason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Hell, we haven't even talked about Ekwonu...

(or Bozeman, for that matter)

Its just amazing to me how confident some fans (well, admittedly very few to be honest) fans are that our coaching staff has everything under control with a flawless grand plan when all evidence and our record strongly suggests otherwise.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I will ask you the same questions.

 

What in your opinion is the absolute best most realistic trade scenario for darnold?  Lets say 5 qb starters go down in preseason.  Even then a conditional 7th and we eat his contract is the best IMO.

So then ask yourself if that is their thought process of "showcasing" darnold is that worth it for a 7th?  Hell no it wouldnt be worth it assuming we could get a 5th.   RHule is shooting himself in the damn foot for no reason

It baffles me how we seemingly think that some decent preseason snaps will make the rest of the league forget about four years of sucking out loud in the regular season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It baffles me how we seemingly think that some decent preseason snaps will make the rest of the league forget about four years of sucking out loud in the regular season.

Granted, but when I look back at some of the other statements Rhule was made (including this latest one) I start to better understand why we are where we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PNW_PantherMan said:

This is why I thought Sam would just get flat out cut.  Baker is the obvious #1, PJ is Matt's boy, and we drafted Corral.  Sam Darnold's salary is already a sunk cost, but his practice reps and roster spot are not.  If we needed a warm body at QB to fill out the roster, it makes sense to keep Sam.  We owe him the money either way.  But if he's taking up someone else's reps, the cost of keeping him extends beyond his salary.

People just afraid to admit how dumb it was to trade for him in the first place, still trying to save face.

It's going cost us more in the long run if he makes the 53 roster this year. 

That locker room knows PJ earned his spot, but Darnold hasn't done anything to suggest he should be on anybody's roster at this point, hell we can't even give him away. Last offer I heard was like we eat all his salary and throw in a 5th round pick and no ones biting. smh

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Granted, but when I look back at some of the other statements Rhule was made (including this latest one) I start to better understand why we are where we are.

I remember going into last season and the bulk of the games defending rhule saying a lot of you were being way too hard on him yada yada yada.  Boy was I wrong.  LIke you say, when you step back and look at the things he has done and said and how he has approached his entire tenure the man is clearly in over his head.  Its not even debatable.  Which leads me to firmly think that posters like @poundaway that still stick up for rhule are either in his organization or a family member because I am not seeing one positive thing from this "process"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...