Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sounds like we made the right call...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, if you had established value for a player, they would literally already have been traded. 

PJ has absolutely zero NFL value. He is a dime a dozen amongst 3rd QB's. Darnold has some limited value as a low tier 2nd QB but at his contract value his tradeability is extremely minimal. 

This idea that we are doing this for trade value is fuging ridiculous. If that is actually the case, there shouldn't be a single fan that isn't incensed. 

Exactly.  Why would a team part with anything for Darnold right now, unless we eat almost all his contract?  They can wait until we either let him go or his contract ends.  It's not like there is going to be a bidding war for his services, or even that they are likely to get 6 games into the season and kick themselves for not having Darnold.  There are going to be a lot of Darnolds, some better, available in the coming weeks.

Some people also act like the 4 years of film on him are locked up somewhere and not accessible to the other 31 teams (30 if you exclude the Jets), or that they think "wow, he looks good in Carolina this TC, that Rhule is a genius has us thinking Darnold has turned a corner."

It is what I call HGTV thinking.  Want to sell your house?  Spend $15k sprucing it up and replacing things that are outdated, so you can make an extra $10k on the sales price......before the commission, of course.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

The whole idea of playing and giving guys more reps so we can create trade value for them leaves out an important part of the equation:  is it worth the reps and time?

Let's say some team decides Darnold is worth trading for, and we get a 7th that could become a 6th, and we eat $16M of his contract?  Is that pick and $2.5M worth giving Mayfield and Corral fewer reps as we try to get one as much time with his offense as possible before the season and try to develop the other?  If you plan to unload Darnold, we are also taking reps from PJ.

This is an opportunity cost question.  You don't just look at what you put in vs. what you got back, you factor in what else you could have done with the resources.  Those things have value, too. 

I couldn’t have said it better.   Awesome post

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

So with your logic were Brandon Smith and barno playing solid entirely because of coaching?  I mean they were even later picks than Corral so that must be some great coaching.

You don’t think coaching factored it to it?  Plus they both have been getting a ton of reps in camp.  Big difference

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

Exactly.  Why would a team part with anything for Darnold right now, unless we eat almost all his contract?  They can wait until we either let him go or his contract ends.  It's not like there is going to be a bidding war for his services, or even that they are likely to get 6 games into the season and kick themselves for not having Darnold.  There are going to be a lot of Darnolds, some better, available in the coming weeks.

Some people also act like the 4 years of film on him are locked up somewhere and not accessible to the other 31 teams (30 if you exclude the Jets), or that they think "wow, he looks good in Carolina this TC, that Rhule is a genius has us thinking Darnold has turned a corner."

It is what I call HGTV thinking.  Want to sell your house?  Spend $15k sprucing it up and replacing things that are outdated, so you can make an extra $10k on the sales price......before the commission, of course.

Yeah, it's a lot of fans high on copium for the ignorant BS we are seeing. 

There are two QB's on our roster that MIGHT have a future with us past next season. They are Baker Mayfield and Matt Corral.

We KNOW Darnold is gone. Any thought of resigning him is pure insanity. PJ Walker is always on a year to year contract based on what we have available as an upgrade as #3 QB. 

Given this situation, there is simply zero reason to not have increased Mayfield and/or Corral's reps. At the point where PJ Walker is trotting in a regular season game, things are already off the rails enough that we know our coach is finished.

 

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

42 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The goal of TC and preseason isn't to showcase bottom end players for trade bait, it's to get your own team prepared.

If Darnold or PJ's reps are being tied to making them more attractive trade options and not purely evaluation for us, then we need to fire Rhule ASAP. 

That's about as derelict in one's duties as you can get for a coach on the hot seat.

Also, they need to figure out who is sticking around because giving reps to a QB that is going to get cut or put on the practice squad(this goes for Darnold, PJ or Corral) is a complete and utter waste of time. 

These shouldn't be fantastically difficult decisions to make for someone who supposedly is an NFL coach.

The reps are to evaluate what to do with the QBs, going in predetermined to slot guys in as starter, backup, 3rd string, cut/PS, etc. is ridiculous. None of the reps have anything to do with making players more attractive trade options. Darnold is pushing Baker, Baker has clearly won (or will within the next week or so).

 

Then from there the question is how can we get rid of Darnold and clear some cap space if possible? Ideally we retain about 75% of his contract and trade him for a conditional 7th or something. We free up $4-5m and don't give anything up, the acquiring team gets a decent QB option for a cheap 1 year deal and no risk (Rams make a lot of sense, McVay can coddle him like he did Goff, if Stafford were to miss time with his elbow issue).

 

If we can't get rid of Sam or decide (based on the reps and what each QB does with them) that it's better to just keep him as backup at his absurd cap hit because PJ/Corral are so far behind, then so be it. If we can offload him and free up cap space then the question is who is the backup between those 2? PJ is clearly ahead of Corral, and if we are going to be able to get rid of Sam to free up space, PJ should be getting reps.

 

A lot of moving parts and all 4 guys getting reps makes sense to factor into decision making. This type of thing is common throughout the league across all the positions. Corral is a 3rd round rookie QB, the Huddle needs to give him time. His reps will increase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm kind of struck by a contrast here...

The 49ers, planning to part ways with Jimmy Garoppolo, tell him not to bother showing up for training camp.

The Panthers, expecting to part ways with PJ Walker, give him the majority of snaps in their first preseason game.

That's called dip-poo leadership. The 49ers are not led by a narcissistic bumbling buffoon who uses a magic eight ball he shakes around to decide what idiotic move to make next with personnel, coaching or even practice reps.

Nfl Reaction GIF by Carolina Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

That's called dip-poo leadership. The 49ers are not led by a narcissistic bumbling buffoon who uses a magic eight ball he shakes around to decide what idiotic move to make next with personnel, coaching or even practice reps.

But tell me, what do you really think of Matt Rhule?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, t96 said:

 

The reps are to evaluate what to do with the QBs, going in predetermined to slot guys in as starter, backup, 3rd string, cut/PS, etc. is ridiculous. None of the reps have anything to do with making players more attractive trade options. Darnold is pushing Baker, Baker has clearly won (or will within the next week or so).

 

Then from there the question is how can we get rid of Darnold and clear some cap space if possible? Ideally we retain about 75% of his contract and trade him for a conditional 7th or something. We free up $4-5m and don't give anything up, the acquiring team gets a decent QB option for a cheap 1 year deal and no risk (Rams make a lot of sense, McVay can coddle him like he did Goff, if Stafford were to miss time with his elbow issue).

 

If we can't get rid of Sam or decide (based on the reps and what each QB does with them) that it's better to just keep him as backup at his absurd cap hit because PJ/Corral are so far behind, then so be it. If we can offload him and free up cap space then the question is who is the backup between those 2? PJ is clearly ahead of Corral, and if we are going to be able to get rid of Sam to free up space, PJ should be getting reps.

 

A lot of moving parts and all 4 guys getting reps makes sense to factor into decision making. This type of thing is common throughout the league across all the positions. Corral is a 3rd round rookie QB, the Huddle needs to give him time. His reps will increase.

I disagree on determining slots for the players. Any league person could say with confidence that Mayfield was going to "win" this job. So at that point the remaining battle is 2nd through 4th. That is basically it.

The whole thing was fuging annoying and it's completely counterproductive for the team as a whole. It's not any different than the stupid BS with the OL. 

There are quite literally limited reps to get these new players to gel. Wasting them on stupid "competitions" that aren't real is fuging absurd.

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, YourLastThought said:

That's called dip-poo leadership. The 49ers are not led by a narcissistic bumbling buffoon who uses a magic eight ball he shakes around to decide what idiotic move to make next with personnel, coaching or even practice reps.

Nfl Reaction GIF by Carolina Panthers

You really need to stop holding back and let us know how you really feel about Rhule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I disagree on determining slots for the players. Any league person could say with confidence that Mayfield was going to "win" this job. So at that point the remaining battle is 2nd through 4th. That is basically it.

The whole thing was fuging annoying and it's completely counterproductive for the team as a whole. It's not any different than the stupid BS with the OL. 

There are quite literally limited reps to get these new players to gel. Wasting them on stupid "competitions" that aren't real is fuging absurd.

Other than Seattle and their (effed up) QB situation, every single coach could field a starting lineup the minute the teams enter camp.  That doesn't mean it is the same depth chart that will exist in September, or November. 

What happens in TC and preseason can change that.  Presumed starters get hurt, fail to recover from injuries, age and lose a step, regress, or just plain suck all of a sudden. 

Presumed backups get better or suddenly elevate their stock.  They can and do show that in the second team reps.  When the overtake happens, these guys get first team reps.

THAT is the competition. The reason is they are trying to prepare the first team for the season.  This is not college, they are not playing Northeastern Southwest Rhode Island State A&M Tech in the opening game.

I get Seattle's situation.  They are openly at the onset of a major rebuild.  Whoever is their starting QB this year gets the job temporarily. They are not expecting Smith or Lock to be the starter a year from now. 

So we are doing the same thing as a team that is tearing the place down to the studs and rebuilding.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sgt Schultz said:

Other than Seattle and their (effed up) QB situation, every single coach could field a starting lineup the minute the teams enter camp.  That doesn't mean it is the same depth chart that will exist in September, or November. 

What happens in TC and preseason can change that.  Presumed starters get hurt, fail to recover from injuries, age and lose a step, regress, or just plain suck all of a sudden. 

Presumed backups get better or suddenly elevate their stock.  They can and do show that in the second team reps.  When the overtake happens, these guys get first team reps.

THAT is the competition. The reason is they are trying to prepare the first team for the season.  This is not college, they are not playing Northeastern Southwest Rhode Island State A&M Tech in the opening game.

I get Seattle's situation.  They are openly at the onset of a major rebuild.  Whoever is their starting QB this year gets the job temporarily. They are not expecting Smith or Lock to be the starter a year from now. 

So we are doing the same thing as a team that is tearing the place down to the studs and rebuilding.

Not only that but both qbs played the entire game

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

Other than Seattle and their (effed up) QB situation, every single coach could field a starting lineup the minute the teams enter camp.  That doesn't mean it is the same depth chart that will exist in September, or November. 

What happens in TC and preseason can change that.  Presumed starters get hurt, fail to recover from injuries, age and lose a step, regress, or just plain suck all of a sudden. 

Presumed backups get better or suddenly elevate their stock.  They can and do show that in the second team reps.  When the overtake happens, these guys get first team reps.

THAT is the competition. The reason is they are trying to prepare the first team for the season.  This is not college, they are not playing Northeastern Southwest Rhode Island State A&M Tech in the opening game.

I get Seattle's situation.  They are openly at the onset of a major rebuild.  Whoever is their starting QB this year gets the job temporarily. They are not expecting Smith or Lock to be the starter a year from now. 

So we are doing the same thing as a team that is tearing the place down to the studs and rebuilding.

We seem to have some sort of fetish for being different than everyone. Listen, the NFL is a copycat league and being innovative can give you a big edge.

This poo isn't innovative, however. We tried that poo with Joe Brady and it failed. I don't see anything these fuging guys are doing that seems "innovative." They just need to be different than anyone else in the NFL for some reason and the results are in. fuging STOP.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I did a lot of research on Xavier Legette for the past few weeks, and as some of you know, I was in favor of making him our first pick. I must say that I got tired of going back and forth seemingly every other day about X, and was so ready for the draft to come in order for the team to "put up or shut up" where X was concerned, and enable discussions on X to move forward. X was (is) the most polarizing player discussed on the Huddle in terms pick 33, and that brought a lot of contentious discussion as well as information. See, you never know what to believe during the draft season, and ever since the Senior Bowl, hints and outright stories of the Panthers' and X's mutual attraction appeared and ramped up so easily, that it was almost unbelievable. So, even though I liked X, and really figured that he should be the pick, the ease of which everything fell into place and the outside noise of different analysts made me lose a little conviction. But one ex-scout developed unshakable conviction all the way through.  Dan Kelly, who used to scout for the Jets back in the day, chose Xavier Legette as the top receiver in the 2024 draft class. I came across his thoughts weeks ago, but I'm sharing them now just to give you some positive food for thought since X is indeed a Panther. There is no boom-or-bust aspect to X in Kelly's estimation, as X is reminiscent of a damned good one. "This Gamecocks receiver conjures memories of how Pro Football Hall of Fame wide receiver Art Monk — the former Washington star — ran his routes." "Legette's sudden and spontaneous moves win initial route leverage against corners and then he wins again at route breakpoints." For as critical as some have been of X's release off the line, when I look at X work, I can't say that Kelly is wrong here. X certainly seems to get open (though admittedly sometimes he just out-physicals the DBs ). "Legette is the best in this draft class at "Mossin'" defenders — that is acrobatically outjumping corners for passes and coming down with circus catches. Legette isn't the next Moss, but he is darn good. He can go deep or sell the deep route well before settling back underneath and making those vitally important chain-moving intermediate-level receptions (11-19 yards)." https://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/scouts_view_the_top_receiver_in_the_nfl_draft_isnt_who_you_think/s1_13132_39987216 On Kelly's own site, First Round Mock, he was a little more specific: "Legette has this spontaneous and impulsive ability to put little moves on corners, whether releasing from the line of scrimmage...or...when going deep. Either way, it’s enough to earn Legette route leverage (position advantage against the cornerback he’s matched up against)." There's that term again: route leverage. Say what you want about X, but he knows how to get it. Lastly, within the scouting report, Kelly really mentions the term again without saying it. "Strong target who showed high-level receiving skills beyond his years...Runs routes to get open rather than well-defined routes which makes him tough to cover. Gets to the spot..." That's ironic, no? X in his roughness makes it ugly for defensive backs to cover him. For me, this was an epiphany when I was looking at some of his clips. Yeah, he may not be the technician that a Diontae Johnson or (dare I say) a Ladd McConkey is, but he always seemed to get where he needed to be. He just simply is not built to be bullied or redirected from the task at hand, and I don't think that's a characteristic or talent (if you will) that can be taught. Sure, he'll be polished up as best that the coaches can, and perhaps that will allow him a smoother release. And I'm sure that the coaches will devise ways to scheme him open, but he's built---physically and mentally to get to where he's going. You saw it last season, and you're going to see it in the pros. Watch what I'm saying. https://firstroundmock.com/2024/02/xavier-legette-reminds-former-nfl-scout-of-these-legends/
    • This is from his draft / combine profile from NFL.com.   https://www.nfl.com/prospects/austin-corbett/3200434f-5200-8097-d4cb-2bd53a7e3b55   Overview Corbett won't blow you away with any of his measurables or play traits, but he's solid in most areas. Corbett is definitely sharp enough to move inside to guard or even center and has good technique, but his average to below average play strength and lack of length may be a concern. He has the size and talent to compete for a guard/center spot early on, but he may elevate above an average starter during his career.   Sources Tell Us "He's smart and just solid all the way around. Long time starter in the league. I think he'll end up at center." - AFC offensive line coach
    • Our own PP won't be held to 9% this go round either.... I think the PK was a bit of an anomaly agaist the Isles...  
×
×
  • Create New...