Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Patriots Gameday Thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, coffee said:

Do you mind if I ask something?

This game was figuring out the very bottom of the roster.  As we knew before the game, most likely, one Qb won't be on the team and the other will be holding a clipboard.  Most of the players won't be here and of those that are, most will be 2nd or 3rd string.  What is it that happened that would cause you to adjust your record prediction?

Last night shows our depth still isnt anywhere close where it needs to be and more importantly as I just said, we looked totally out of sync and totally unprepared.  Thats a problem much bigger then the lack of depth.

 

With our schedule and our knack for having injuries 6/7 wins is IMO our best case scenario.  I am just hoping rhule doesnt sell tepper a bill of goods about not having Corral all year, making progress, plan is working rah rah rah and he gets a 4rth season

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I just cannot get over just how incompetent we looked last night.  I mean both sides of the ball just looked like they didnt have a clue.   I think that is more concerning then our lack of depth, which yeah man appears to be an issue as well

Shi was the only guy on offense/special teams that really stood out. Not worried about Higgins, he didn't need to risk doing too much in a game like that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Last night shows our depth still isnt anywhere close where it needs to be and more importantly as I just said, we looked totally out of sync and totally unprepared.  Thats a problem much bigger then the lack of depth.

 

With our schedule and our knack for having injuries 6/7 wins is IMO our best case scenario.  I am just hoping rhule doesnt sell tepper a bill of goods about not having Corral all year, making progress, plan is working rah rah rah and he gets a 4rth season

OK, thank you.

You feel this way even though it was our 2/3 stringers vs. their 1/2's?  It seemed to me that, in view of that, the team held their own pretty well.  It also seemed that it was mostly QB issues that cost the game.  We even had a chance to to win with a final drive but, again, poor QB play by a QB who won't be on the team.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

Corral’s first deep hall was a perfect throw that would’ve been caught if it were a better WR. 

 

10 hours ago, WOW!! said:

And not a DPi on the play..

There was DPI but that was not a perfect throw. It was very under thrown. The only reason there was DPI is because the receiver had to almost stop to try to make the catch and the defender basically ran into him.

Edited by Floppin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, poundaway said:

You seem confident.  I'm pretty confident we will have more than 6 wins.  Want to bet?

I'll take that action.

I'll put up every dumb thing 4Corners has ever said on the huddle. 

Oh you don't have enough storage space for that? Yeah neither does the federal government.

Okay how about just every dumb thing he's said in the last year?

You're not willing to rent out that many storage units?

Fine, every dumb thing he's said in the last month.

Let me go rent the biggest truck they've got at Uhaul.

Now what are you putting up?

No I don't want your nude pictures of Ernest Borgnine.

Gross.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, coffee said:

OK, thank you.

You feel this way even though it was our 2/3 stringers vs. their 1/2's?  It seemed to me that, in view of that, the team held their own pretty well.  It also seemed that it was mostly QB issues that cost the game.  We even had a chance to to win with a final drive but, again, poor QB play by a QB who won't be on the team.

our first string left side of the line didnt look good at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

wtf is it with you and wanting to bet on a messageboard, thats fuging childish

Avatar for avatar.

1 month. I bet we  win at least 7 games.
 

You post with such certitude.  Here's your chance to prove it.

You think we will only get 6 games.  Put your avatar where your mouth is.

 

Edited by poundaway
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...