Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Bills at Panthers GameDay Thread

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TrevorLaurenceTime22 Grand Master

TrevorLaurenceTime22

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, frankw said:

Yeah I've been very hard on Darnold but I hate to see that for anyone. He can recover and lick his wounds with that 18 million dollars though no worries Sam.

He is a horrible QB I don't wish that injury on anyone but I'll say as an everyday fan it's a little hard to feel too bad for him when he's collecting more this season on IR or cut than 99% of this board will have at 65 retiring.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TrevorLaurenceTime22 Grand Master

TrevorLaurenceTime22

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

Yeah, and Cam's most recent statements suggest he is still looking for a starting gig, and I don't blame him.  But if he were to come back, even just that added dimension at the goal line would be another incredible weapon to have...

But I agree, it feels like the relationship is done from both sides.

Cams not a starter anymore and he has too much pride to he a true backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Broken or torn.

Could be the dreaded high ankle sprain. Those are usually longer recovery than an actual broken ankle.

Yeah, that's was my thought...  a fracture or high ankle sprain, but it usually seems like it takes a bit longer for them to evaluate/diagnose and then rule out guys with high ankle sprains.  This seemed quicker.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

Yeah, that's was my thought...  a fracture or high ankle sprain, but it usually seems like it takes a bit longer for them to evaluate/diagnose and then rule out guys with high ankle sprains.  This seemed quicker.

Nah. High ankle is usually out immediately. Pretty painful from what I have heard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

He is a horrible QB I don't wish that injury on anyone but I'll say as an everyday fan it's a little hard to feel too bad for him when he's collecting more this season on IR or cut than 99% of this board will have at 65 retiring.

All while being horrible at his job.  Imagine!

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted
Just now, kungfoodude said:

Nah. High ankle is usually out immediately. Pretty painful from what I have heard.

Well, I know it's relatively quick to figure out from their inability to put weight on it and such, but idk...  just seems like it usually takes them longer to definitively diagnose that.  

But, either way, I'm thinking that's minimum 4 weeks, more likely 6.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...