Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person: Panthers interested in trading for Jets WR Denzel Mims

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Mims had 12 yards a game. TMJ had 10 yards a game. 

I'd rather have 10 yards and zero drops than 12 yards and higher drop rate than Robby.

TMJ was a rookie and injured.  What was Mim's excuse?

Robby Anderson's drop rate has not been a thing but for two weeks. Give it a break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

You are looking at 2021, I am looking at Mims career stats.

Mims excuse was he was in the coaching staff doghouse, so he was available to play. TMJ was not and when he was he made little to no impact.

I can't believe you are pulling for us to get a former Baylor WR who has shown nothing in the NFL for 2 years and had a higher drop rate than Robby last year.

I'm not interested.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
Just now, poundaway said:

Wanna bet?

I mean, you are in here saying please no.....for a reason.  Matt Rhule is a clown. 

I think Matt Rhule will do 100 stupid things just like last year.   I can't accurately predict his stupidity though. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, you are in here saying please no.....for a reason.  Matt Rhule is a clown. 

I think Matt Rhule will do 100 stupid things just like last year.   I can't accurately predict his stupidity though. 

So take the bet.

If Higgins is traded for Mims, you choose my avatar for two weeks.

If not, I choose yours for two.

Edited by poundaway
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, poundaway said:

I can't believe you are pulling for us to get a former Baylor WR who has shown nothing in the NFL for 2 years and had a higher drop rate than Robby last year.

I'm not interested.

I am not pulling. I am just saying TMJ is about the only thing I would be willing to give up. 

I don't think either is going to pan out so what would it matter?

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
Just now, kungfoodude said:

I am not pulling. I am just saying TMJ is about the only thing I would be willing to give up. 

I don't think either is going to pan out so what would it matter?

I think its way too early to see what TMJ can do.  His cap cost is minimal and his draft capital is sunk. 

Lets at least let him play 2 years.  Sheesh.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, poundaway said:

I think its way too early to see what TMJ can do.  His cap cost is minimal and his draft capital is sunk. 

Lets at least let him play 2 years.  Sheesh.

I am not the one making these decisions, Rhule himself has basically indicated he is close to getting cut or at least buried on the depth chart.

I don't think he is the coach that is going to elevate TMJ.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...