Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Refs screwed us


gorillamilitia13
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Once again back to namecalling. You've spent all this time carrying water for Rhule and screaming at CRA in thread after thread after thread after thread about Joe Brady but now it's all the refs. You are delusional beyond words.

You're still infatuated with Rhule.  Rhule sucked yesterday. 

This thread is about the refs, you know the guys in black in white whose ass your lips are attached to.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Just block him it will help the headaches....

I am no Rhule lover but actively rooting for failure in week 1 as he does grates my sense of knock a fool.

  Haters like him need to be checked.  He's going to be polishing the refs and Giants knobs all week.  Very troll-like.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

 hoping the refs will bail you out of a poor excuse for a football game is pretty weak.

When all else fails, go after the refs, I guess.

Thats the Browns. They were the ones bailed out by the refs.  We just want them to call a fair game.

There are a lot of people here on team Zebra.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Football has been around for a long time.  If you lose because of the refs.  You still lost.  We put ourselves in position for the refs to be able to "impact" the game.  Because our team was unprepared, we had a bad gameplan, and stunk all game. 

Matt Rhule post game said he didn't believe the Browns could get in FG position in a minute.  He must not watch a lot of football then.  Because NFL teams routinely pull that off at the end of games. 

and the dope was left at the end of the game w/ a timeout.  Should of used it like the Broncos did week 1 in the Super Bowl rematch. 

Yes, the refs sucked.  Yes, they botched calls that last drive.  Refs botch calls.  They do it all game, in every game. 

In the end the better team won.  It is what it is.  But it would have been nice if they at least got the fake spike right.  Maybe if Matt Rhule knew how bad they botched it like he said....he should of gone apeshit in game on the refs about it and tired to get something done.  Didn't see that happen either.   That was the game.  And he didn't seem to care that much IMO. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Anybodyhome said:

When you're a bad team with bad leadership and a complete lack of discipline across the spectrum, hoping the refs will bail you out of a poor excuse for a football game is pretty weak.

When all else fails, go after the refs, I guess.

Yep, because playing like dog poo for 3 straight quarters is the ref's fault.  Had we handled our business, that last drive for Cleveland wouldn't have mattered.  It only mattered because when the game was nearly out of hand, we finally figured out how to play football and made the game close.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CMC got 14 touches yesterday and people complained that he didn't get enough. CMC in the past was getting majority of the touches and people still complain.

That should have been a come back win for the Panthers despite all the mistakes we made in the first half. I just think Baker was too hyped in the first half. He started to mellow out as the game went out. Those tipped balls killed our drives. People were open. That fuging holding called on Ian Thomas killed a drive too. We just couldn't stop the run. If we could just stop them from running the ball we win that game easily.

The same coaching staff that people are talking poo about is the same coaching staff that coached this team to score 17 points in the 4th quarter. Even through all the poo that happened in the 1st 3 quarters, we had the lead and those two calls definitely played a part in that. People are dismissing those two calls because of their pure hatred for Rhule. 

I am not defending Rhule by no means. I killed him for calling the timeout at the end of the half when the Browns was going for it when they had no timeouts. I would have let them went for it and took my chances.

I blame this stupid ass defensive scheme that we got. We don't have players to stop the run. Every last one of them are undersized. There was a few times defenders did get in the backfield but they couldn't tackle. I'm pretty sure we are going to see the same thing with the Giants next week. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 pages of two sides not arguing the other side in good faith. The thread is titled, "refs screwed us" not "the refs are the only reason we lost this game" if everyone in this thread agrees the refs made bad calls than the refs indeed screwed the panthers. Why are you arguing just to argue?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, poundaway said:

  Haters like him need to be checked.  He's going to be polishing the refs and Giants knobs all week.  Very troll-like.

I'll be here now the end of the season and in between unlike you who will go into hiding in December again if we are losing. That's called Fairweather. But keep crying about those haters and blaming everyone else. It won't help us win games.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...