Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

About our OL


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Dogshit tier, looked like last year's group. Since paying Moton, his play has taken a nose drive....he was awful in this game.

 

27 minutes ago, Basbear said:

You may post a play or two, both he was terrible for the whole game. He was supposed to the rock solid vet, got beat up more than Ickey. Guess I need to lower my expectations.  

Is that the go to complaint for people who want something to complain about? They get paid and then....

Moton played fine Sunday and has been consistent even since signing his extension. Clowney didn't even sniff Baker until he was chased out of the pocket by Garrett or it collapsed due to pressure elsewhere. People try to poo on o-line and d-linemen so much and don't know what the hell they are even looking at. There were a number of plays that they ran stunts, brought pressure and Moton was a singular bright spot on the line. Clowney had a half a sack.  

Edited by NorthTryon
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NorthTryon said:

 

Is that the go to complaint for people who want something to complain about? They get paid and then....

Moton played fine Sunday and has been consistent even since signing his extension. Clowney didn't even sniff Baker until he was chased out of the pocket by Garrett or it collapsed due to pressure elsewhere. People try to poo on o-line and d-linemen so much and don't know what the hell they are even looking at. There were a number of plays that they ran stunts, brought pressure and Moton was a singular bright spot on the line. Clowney had a half a sack.  

You need to re-watch the game and focus on Moton. FYI I had a high hopes for him heading in.

After you re-watch the game, listen to old smitty whom shared my feelings- 

https://omny.fm/shows/the-kyle-bailey-show-podcast/the-clubhouse-steve-smith-56

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...