Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Great offensive breakdown


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Im not sure knocking over a defensive player should ever be declared a negative play. It didnt help Moton, but Elf's job there is to hit the closest man since he didnt have anyone in front of him. He knocked over the DT and the DT fell over into Clowney and Moton. 

I cant think of what else you would ask of Elf in that situation...

Was just pointing out that even when Elflein has a good play, he finds a way to fug things up 😛

Let me have my scapegoat dammit! Every Huddler needs one! 😭

Edited by Icege
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

its funny bc we ran a lot of play action plays, the Browns just didnt bite. It's possible its due to the fact we just didnt hand it off much, ha. My only defending statement there is that most of the botched snaps were running plays. So that was 3-5 less run plays we were able to run.

We didn't really establish any reason for them to bite on it early.  It is one of those things you have to set up, and given the expectations coming into the game, it would have only taken a few more early runs (especially if they gained yardage) to give them a pause.  As it was, we were sort of like having Dan Fouts run play action with the Chargers.  Yeah, great, but everybody knows you aren't handing the ball off.

People are mentioning Christenson, and part of what people miss is even the best young OL develop, usually both in technique and physically.  Well, the ones that don't last may not, but everybody else does.  BC is not an idiot, mouth-breathing pure mauler, so he probably knew prior to being drafted what he needed to do on all counts.  The fact that he did it should not be a surprise.  Perhaps the extent, but not the fact he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

We didn't really establish any reason for them to bite on it early.  It is one of those things you have to set up, and given the expectations coming into the game, it would have only taken a few more early runs (especially if they gained yardage) to give them a pause.  As it was, we were sort of like having Dan Fouts run play action with the Chargers.  Yeah, great, but everybody knows you aren't handing the ball off.

People are mentioning Christenson, and part of what people miss is even the best young OL develop, usually both in technique and physically.  Well, the ones that don't last may not, but everybody else does.  BC is not an idiot, mouth-breathing pure mauler, so he probably knew prior to being drafted what he needed to do on all counts.  The fact that he did it should not be a surprise.  Perhaps the extent, but not the fact he did.

Very well put. The one piece about BC... if he commits to being a guard and adds some more weight... oh man. This guy is going to cost us some money. I will hold my horses, but if what we saw on sunday continues... hats off to Fitt/Rhule for waiting it out and grabbing this guy. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Icege said:

Does somebody need to point out to Monty that Clowney has Moton in Baker's lap during the throw and was what forced Baker to get it out?

Don't get me wrong, bad throw, but how are we going to say that he came off of DJ too early when Clowney's got a paw in his face?

When Baker looks off of Moore, there isn't anyone in his face. And even at the point where he threw the ball, he could have climbed the pocket. I'm not even certain what he saw on the right side that he was throwing at. I get Moore was 1 vs 2, but he should have waited until after Moore's cut or gone back to him after looking right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sgt Schultz said:

We didn't really establish any reason for them to bite on it early.  It is one of those things you have to set up, and given the expectations coming into the game, it would have only taken a few more early runs (especially if they gained yardage) to give them a pause.  As it was, we were sort of like having Dan Fouts run play action with the Chargers.  Yeah, great, but everybody knows you aren't handing the ball off.

People are mentioning Christenson, and part of what people miss is even the best young OL develop, usually both in technique and physically.  Well, the ones that don't last may not, but everybody else does.  BC is not an idiot, mouth-breathing pure mauler, so he probably knew prior to being drafted what he needed to do on all counts.  The fact that he did it should not be a surprise.  Perhaps the extent, but not the fact he did.

Yeah PA is actually detrimental if you don't set up the run first. We would have been better using draws but you still face two of the best DEs in the game either way. Defense really needed to win this game because of how good the Browns DEs we're and they didn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Snake said:

Yeah PA is actually detrimental if you don't set up the run first. We would have been better using draws but you still face two of the best DEs in the game either way. Defense really needed to win this game because of how good the Browns DEs we're and they didn't. 

Which coach was it that used PA to setup the run instead of setting up the pass? Was that Mike Martz? I feel like it was a Lions coach.... mid 2000s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great content thanks. Either Baker and the rest of the offense just need more time together to clean these issues up or we may also have to face the reality that this could be who Mayfield is. He has the talent but he has been very up and down through his career to this point and that is why he was available. I like the fire but he also needs to just let his game speak for itself from here on. I've heard enough trash talk. Show us what you've got on the field. I am expecting a bounce back game from him and I hope it will be through four quarters this time.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...