Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Igo, any credence to this?


Ivan The Awesome
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, CRA said:

Just talking in general. GM should hire the HC.  

and if you have a shaky GM and fire your HC…..start all the way over.  That would have been Hurney going with Ron. 

 

Understood.

I'll always wonder what would have happened if Tepper would have fired Marty first and paired Rivera with a better GM.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I’m fine with moving on but way more people than you think believe we’ll be a playoff team without Rhule. Then again you can see how many people in here believe that if Rhule left, Luke would be coaching or heck come out of retirement.

Even if we do have a quality roster, we don't become a playoff team simply by dumping Rhule.

A new staff will have to train players and tailor the roster to fit their schemes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I’m fine with moving on but way more people than you think believe we’ll be a playoff team without Rhule. Then again you can see how many people in here believe that if Rhule left, Luke would be coaching or heck come out of retirement.

In my fan fiction world…

we fire Matt Rhule in season

Then the next week get a new addition and Luke comes back to play LB and comes out of the tunnel like….

image.gif.2f62607f6c2875ca5426cc54dfc324a9.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I’m fine with moving on but way more people than you think believe we’ll be a playoff team without Rhule. Then again you can see how many people in here believe that if Rhule left, Luke would be coaching or heck come out of retirement.

Not I, said the fly. 

If we run Rhule (and Snow by default) out of town it will not be because this team will be a playoff team starting the day after they leave.  We are going to probably suck at least through the end of the season, but if it gets to that point we have concluded we are going to suck either way.  Which makes the decision to dispatch them one of cutting losses to see if we can move forward faster.

It is also possible we will be better the day after we run them out, since changing from college schemes to NFL schemes can produce immediate improvement in the NFL.  The problem is the personnel are built around the college schemes, especially of defense and especially on the line.  Which means I would not be holding my breath for immediate improvement, but hopefully the bleeding would stop.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I’m fine with moving on but way more people than you think believe we’ll be a playoff team without Rhule. Then again you can see how many people in here believe that if Rhule left, Luke would be coaching or heck come out of retirement.

That is pretty unrealistic expectations for sure. I just hadn't seen that much here on that train to disappointment. Just hope of something better.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, 4Corners said:

I believe and agree with all of it. 
 

I will side with Steve Wilkes over Phil Snow 10/10 times. Fire Snow and make Wilkes the DC and I guarantee the defense will improve. 
 

what sucks is that we are one game in and it already feels like a lost season. 

THIS. I never felt so demoralized going into the second game of season. This is just sad we have almost 4 more months of this crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Bet Bozeman would've known about "earning" it before signing here now...

This right here pisses me off as well, i kinda feel bad for bozeman cuz he is likeable and could have secured a payday somewhere else. I wasnt even expecting him to be second fiddle to elflein not even under Rhule...man i had that wrong. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Can't keep pining for what never happened....but for god sakes, DeJean, Frazier... and we got this dude in a R1 trade up.  The most notable blunder of this era, that's for sure. 
    • Overall, fine.  Wish we landed a guy to pair with Lloyd but I presume this means they're giving Trevin one final year to put it together (72nd overall 2 years back).  Flashed potential year 1, had a dud last year.   R1: Freeling LT - Great value and a need; landed our new long term LT that could end up starting off the bat.  Icky had a terrible injury and is not playing in his contract year.  Walker is what he is on a 1-year rental, who even knows how he fits. You get premier OTs early if you can find em' and he has what you want.  I thought he could have gone as high as 6/CLE pre-draft, so am a big fan of the selection.  Looking at this class, he's one of the guys at the top that is like "okay that's the LT".  Others have this right/left or G/T type discussion about them.  Freeling is an LT.   R2: Hunter NT - We didn't really have anyone replacing A'Shawn's snaps in our rotation.  Wharton & Brown aren't 3 downers so adding Hunter to the mix fills a big void. I dug deep into S and LB this draft so was a bit to zeroed in - In recognize the value and impact add in the trenches. R3: Brazzell WR - Intriguing.  Given our history, I don't really want to place any expectations here, but a different style weapon for Bryce. I pretty much expect a WR drafted yearly with this regime. Other notables.. Hecht C - These are the type of rounds where starting centers have been found.  We got a starter for this year, but Hecht seems pretty capable and I like it for a long term find.  SOLID AF.  Wheatley S - A pretty well regarded safety prospect.  And we see it every year (like this one) safeties get hyped, people think they may go sooner than expected, and the league reminds them how it rolls.  Plenty of nice safeties have been found in the 4th-6th in recent years.  Big fan of Wheatley. Can't say I know enough about Lee or the others. 
×
×
  • Create New...