Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Winston playing with fractured vertebraes

raleigh-panther

By raleigh-panther,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
  • Author
Posted
39 minutes ago, Snake said:

NO hung with Tampa till they got into that fight and lost their best CB. We are no were near the talent of TB. We're going to get throttled by NO and their defense. 

This is what I think

and, if they didn’t stop Jones, they will have fits with hill and always have 

when you don’t have LBs and can’t hold sn edge, well

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TylerDurden Grand Master

TylerDurden

Posted
Posted

Lol remember... was it last year or the year before where they literally had no receivers?  They had to promote multiple guys off the PS and people here were all giddy going in thinking that was an automatic dub and they came out and whooped our ass like they just lined up three prime Colstons.  That poo never matters.  They're still gonna whoop our ass.  Difference is, I want them to this time...  put the nail in the Rhule coffin.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted (edited)

fug that. All aboard the tank train. Why win 4 games and get fuged out of a top 5 pick? Hell we need number 1 for the new coaching staff. 

most of this team and staff are utter trash and while I don’t think they’ll win even trying I don’t want any dumbass moral wins vs injured players and/or their back ups

you ‘never tank!’ crowd had your super bowl vs the Saints third stringers several years ago that fuged us out of a top pick and been ass ever since, go watch those reruns and celebrate

It’s time to let us have the proper tank and actually look forward to at the very least hope of a future

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrianS Veteran

BrianS

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Barkley still managed to hammer us when it counted the most.

We pretty well sold out to stop the run. Guessing we probably didn't think Jones could beat us passing, but he did.

Disagree.

Any time you defense gives up 19 points, you gotta expect your offense to keep you above water.  At 19 points per game, our defense would have ranked fourth in scoring defense last year.  I don't hold much to yardage defense, but scoring defense is a stat that matter.

Likewise, on offense, scoring fewer than 19 points would have made you one of the bottom 7 teams in the league.

I feel like our defense did fine, and our offense crapped the bed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Disagree.

Any time you defense gives up 19 points, you gotta expect your offense to keep you above water.  At 19 points per game, our defense would have ranked fourth in scoring defense last year.  I don't hold much to yardage defense, but scoring defense is a stat that matter.

Likewise, on offense, scoring fewer than 19 points would have made you one of the bottom 7 teams in the league.

I feel like our defense did fine, and our offense crapped the bed.

 

Not when we needed to hold them and get the ball back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peon Awesome Experienced

Peon Awesome

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Barkley still managed to hammer us when it counted the most.

We pretty well sold out to stop the run. Guessing we probably didn't think Jones could beat us passing, but he did.

I wouldn't go that far. Daniel Jones averaged 5.2 yards per attempt on 34 passes; that's bad by any metric. Barkley averaged 3.4 yards per carry; his longest carry was 16 yards and a player like him running 21 times and expecting him to not have a single decent run is not realistic. We gave up 19 points despite turning it over twice in our own territory. Hard to be too critical of the defense here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CanadianCat
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By CanadianCat · Posted

      Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • Panthering
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By Panthering · Posted

      This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • tukafan21
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...