Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is there any reason to keep Robbie Anderson after this year?


Snake
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Snake said:

He's the second highest paid player on this team and return on investment isn't coming up in the green. With a potential out coming in 23 we could trade or cut him and save a good bit in a rebuild year. Discuss. 

We lose on Sunday.  Both he and cmac better be traded by Tuesday.   Get a first for cmac and a 4rth maybe 3rd for sideshow bob

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

We lose on Sunday.  Both he and cmac better be traded by Tuesday.   Get a first for cmac and a 4rth maybe 3rd for sideshow bob

CMC would cost 19.5M in EXTRA cap space, immediately, if he’s traded now. RA about 10M. And they already restructured every vet on team but Erving. 
 

   That “mythical” salary cap does have consequences when you borrow from the future to build 5 win teams. 

Edited by Toomers
  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

CMC would cost 19.5M in EXTRA cap space, immediately, if he’s traded now. RA about 10M. And they already restructured every vet on team but Erving. 
 

   That “mythical” salary does have consequences when you borrow from the future to build 5 win teams. 

Damn it.   Makes me hate fitt and Hurley even more.   No good reason to extend either of the two. 
 

so we have to wait until the off season to trade cmac?

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, Hooker was a guy that was drafted in the 3rd round pick sitting behind a well established starter yet Detroit somehow saw enough to let him go after two offseasons.  Where does that fit into your ideal situation?
    • Like that matters. That's the first thing. I suggested that it's probably better to let a QB sit and learn, and that's what I meant. Secondly, in what planet am I making excuses, my friend, or engaging in any mental gymnastics in Bryce Young's defense? As I have said, I don't care if he turns into Mighty Mouse, it's time for him to go. In my opinion, he's too short to be a successful QB in the NFL. I have seen enough. I'd rather trade him and take my chances with Hooker, at least he's more of a prototypical size and can actually see where and why he's throwing the ball.
    • There is a scenario where our team comes out prepared to play football instead of shitting the bed for the first quarter. Every bad Bryce game seems to start with him looking incompetent - the OL looking incompetent - and the defense looking incompetent.  Boom, down 14 before we know what hit us. Imagine a world where we come prepared and play with a lead, and Bryce gets to fulfill his ceiling by managing a game instead of playing catch up. He's bad, but upon reflection he is not Clausen bad.  He can move the team down the field when he gets 4 - 5 seconds in a clean pocket against a soft zone.  I don't think Clausen could do that.
×
×
  • Create New...