Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Robbie Anderson: Fans shouldn't bring negative energy


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, frankw said:

Receiving wise he had weapons in 89 Olsen and Shockey and he had Gross (and a young R Kalil) but that was about it. As far as the build around him he was the lone man standing from the entire draft the year we selected him that's pretty damn ugly you should at least get one other starter out of a whole draft. For the most part the Panthers got by on the save me Cam formula we would have had a Lombardi trophy if they had not squandered so many chances to properly build a line around him in his prime. But it's the past now.

he had Gross, Wharton, and Kalil at LT, LG, and C.   Young Kalil was already a multi time Pro Bowler.  Just like Gross.    And a solid RG.  That's a solid OL for a rookie. 

Then you give him Double Trouble, Olsen and Shockey and  a HOF stud WR. 

Now, the build as we went forward sucked.  But he was dropped into a good spot for early success and growth. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

he had Gross, Wharton, and Kalil at LT, LG, and C.   Young Kalil was already a multi time Pro Bowler.  Just like Gross.    And a solid RG.  That's a solid OL for a rookie. 

Then you give him Double Trouble, Olsen and Shockey and  a HOF stud WR. 

Now, the build as we went forward sucked.  But he was dropped into a good spot for early success and growth. 

And that first year he chose to throw to legadooo doo Nanee too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

he had Gross, Wharton, and Kalil at LT, LG, and C.   Young Kalil was already a multi time Pro Bowler.  Just like Gross.    And a solid RG.  That's a solid OL for a rookie. 

Then you give him Double Trouble, Olsen and Shockey and  a HOF stud WR. 

Now, the build as we went forward sucked.  But he was dropped into a good spot for early success and growth. 

LOL

When this is listed for Rhule starting off in worse spot than RR, its dismiessed.

When comparing Cam to Fields, it means the world.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, CRA said:

he had Gross, Wharton, and Kalil at LT, LG, and C.   Young Kalil was already a multi time Pro Bowler.  Just like Gross.    And a solid RG.  That's a solid OL for a rookie. 

Then you give him Double Trouble, Olsen and Shockey and  a HOF stud WR. 

Now, the build as we went forward sucked.  But he was dropped into a good spot for early success and growth. 

Crazy thing about Double Trouble I think with Cam we only had a back eclipse 1k rushing yards once through those years and that was Stewart. Again the staff couldn't stop leaning on Cam too heavily and it is why his career was ultimately shortened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, poundaway said:

LOL

When this is listed for Rhule starting off in worse spot than RR, its dismiessed.

When comparing Cam to Fields, it means the world.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Ron brought in Olsen, Shockey and Cam.  They don’t count as inherited players.  

and I don’t think I have ever even discussed Ron’s inherited roster in 2011 vs Rhule’s.  

I have argued against the notion Rhule inherited slop which gets pimped.   Rhule fanboys like yourself have gone to great lengths to downplay and trash it.  Best part of his roster 3 years in is still his inherited players 

If that 2020 team was well coached they would have won more games.   They were in every game with a chance to win despite not even having basic NFL coaching and prep (minus games vs the eventual SB champ) And Rhule still inherited Cam and Luke on top of that.  He opted to kick Cam to the curb and Luke wanted no part of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

Ron brought in Olsen, Shockey and Cam.  They don’t count as inherited players.  

and I don’t think I have ever even discussed Ron’s inherited roster in 2011 vs Rhule’s.  

I have argued against the notion Rhule inherited slop which gets pimped.   Rhule fanboys like yourself have gone to great lengths to downplay and trash it.  Best part of his roster 3 years in is still his inherited players 

If that 2020 team was well coached they would have won more games.   They were in every game with a chance to win despite not even having basic NFL coaching and prep (minus games vs the eventual SB champ) And Rhule still inherited Cam and Luke on top of that.  He opted to kick Cam to the curb and Luke wanted no part of it. 

First nearly everyone agrees that Ron did not have the power on the draft or FA that Rhule has.

Second he was GIVEN the #1 pick with a horrible QB the previous year.  Who exactly was Hurney going to pick, Blain Gabbert?

Your statement on Cam is absolute joke. 

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Edited by poundaway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

Cam never played with a 1k yard back until CMC

Yeah I was thinking of 2015 Stewart had 989 rushing yards so two good carries away from the mark. But again shows we leaned way too heavily on Cam versus a versatile attack like what Buffalo has with Josh Allen and their offense.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, frankw said:

Yeah I was thinking of 2015 Stewart had 989 rushing yards so two good carries away from the mark. But again shows we leaned way too heavily on Cam versus a versatile attack like what Buffalo has with Josh Allen and their offense.

Yea he came close a couple times. Injuries robbed him of a more productive career. That and a stable offensive line and tbh I don't know if Buffalo has had a 1k rusher in Josh Allen's time either just comes with the territory of having a mobile QB especially down near the goal line

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...