Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Robbie Anderson: Fans shouldn't bring negative energy


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, frankw said:

Receiving wise he had weapons in 89 Olsen and Shockey and he had Gross (and a young R Kalil) but that was about it. As far as the build around him he was the lone man standing from the entire draft the year we selected him that's pretty damn ugly you should at least get one other starter out of a whole draft. For the most part the Panthers got by on the save me Cam formula we would have had a Lombardi trophy if they had not squandered so many chances to properly build a line around him in his prime. But it's the past now.

he had Gross, Wharton, and Kalil at LT, LG, and C.   Young Kalil was already a multi time Pro Bowler.  Just like Gross.    And a solid RG.  That's a solid OL for a rookie. 

Then you give him Double Trouble, Olsen and Shockey and  a HOF stud WR. 

Now, the build as we went forward sucked.  But he was dropped into a good spot for early success and growth. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

he had Gross, Wharton, and Kalil at LT, LG, and C.   Young Kalil was already a multi time Pro Bowler.  Just like Gross.    And a solid RG.  That's a solid OL for a rookie. 

Then you give him Double Trouble, Olsen and Shockey and  a HOF stud WR. 

Now, the build as we went forward sucked.  But he was dropped into a good spot for early success and growth. 

And that first year he chose to throw to legadooo doo Nanee too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

he had Gross, Wharton, and Kalil at LT, LG, and C.   Young Kalil was already a multi time Pro Bowler.  Just like Gross.    And a solid RG.  That's a solid OL for a rookie. 

Then you give him Double Trouble, Olsen and Shockey and  a HOF stud WR. 

Now, the build as we went forward sucked.  But he was dropped into a good spot for early success and growth. 

LOL

When this is listed for Rhule starting off in worse spot than RR, its dismiessed.

When comparing Cam to Fields, it means the world.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, CRA said:

he had Gross, Wharton, and Kalil at LT, LG, and C.   Young Kalil was already a multi time Pro Bowler.  Just like Gross.    And a solid RG.  That's a solid OL for a rookie. 

Then you give him Double Trouble, Olsen and Shockey and  a HOF stud WR. 

Now, the build as we went forward sucked.  But he was dropped into a good spot for early success and growth. 

Crazy thing about Double Trouble I think with Cam we only had a back eclipse 1k rushing yards once through those years and that was Stewart. Again the staff couldn't stop leaning on Cam too heavily and it is why his career was ultimately shortened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, poundaway said:

LOL

When this is listed for Rhule starting off in worse spot than RR, its dismiessed.

When comparing Cam to Fields, it means the world.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Ron brought in Olsen, Shockey and Cam.  They don’t count as inherited players.  

and I don’t think I have ever even discussed Ron’s inherited roster in 2011 vs Rhule’s.  

I have argued against the notion Rhule inherited slop which gets pimped.   Rhule fanboys like yourself have gone to great lengths to downplay and trash it.  Best part of his roster 3 years in is still his inherited players 

If that 2020 team was well coached they would have won more games.   They were in every game with a chance to win despite not even having basic NFL coaching and prep (minus games vs the eventual SB champ) And Rhule still inherited Cam and Luke on top of that.  He opted to kick Cam to the curb and Luke wanted no part of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

Ron brought in Olsen, Shockey and Cam.  They don’t count as inherited players.  

and I don’t think I have ever even discussed Ron’s inherited roster in 2011 vs Rhule’s.  

I have argued against the notion Rhule inherited slop which gets pimped.   Rhule fanboys like yourself have gone to great lengths to downplay and trash it.  Best part of his roster 3 years in is still his inherited players 

If that 2020 team was well coached they would have won more games.   They were in every game with a chance to win despite not even having basic NFL coaching and prep (minus games vs the eventual SB champ) And Rhule still inherited Cam and Luke on top of that.  He opted to kick Cam to the curb and Luke wanted no part of it. 

First nearly everyone agrees that Ron did not have the power on the draft or FA that Rhule has.

Second he was GIVEN the #1 pick with a horrible QB the previous year.  Who exactly was Hurney going to pick, Blain Gabbert?

Your statement on Cam is absolute joke. 

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Edited by poundaway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

Cam never played with a 1k yard back until CMC

Yeah I was thinking of 2015 Stewart had 989 rushing yards so two good carries away from the mark. But again shows we leaned way too heavily on Cam versus a versatile attack like what Buffalo has with Josh Allen and their offense.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, frankw said:

Yeah I was thinking of 2015 Stewart had 989 rushing yards so two good carries away from the mark. But again shows we leaned way too heavily on Cam versus a versatile attack like what Buffalo has with Josh Allen and their offense.

Yea he came close a couple times. Injuries robbed him of a more productive career. That and a stable offensive line and tbh I don't know if Buffalo has had a 1k rusher in Josh Allen's time either just comes with the territory of having a mobile QB especially down near the goal line

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Quickbooks Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438 a free application provided by Intuit, designed to diagnose and fix various QuickBooks errors with ease. With a comprehensive set of tools, the Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438 simplifies the troubleshooting process and saves you valuable time. So why should you choose the QuickBooks Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438? Here are some key benefits: If you don't know how to use the QuickBooks Tool Hub, after following this article on How to Download QuickBooks Tool Hub please see the detailed article on How to Use QuickBooks Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438. Please feel free to comment and subscribe to our posts for free tutorials like this. Benefits of Using QuickBooks Tool Hub? Saves time: The QuickBooks Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438 saves time by providing a one-stop-shop for fixing various QuickBooks errors like QuickBooks Error H202, QuickBooks Error H505, QuickBooks Unrecoverable Error , QuickBooks Error 1904, QuickBooks Error 1328, QuickBooks Data Recovery etc. You don't need to search for different tools or methods to fix the error. Just download the tool using the  QuickBooks Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438 Download Link below. Easy to use: The QuickBooks Tool Hub is easy to use, even for non-technical users. The on-screen instructions are clear and straightforward, making it easy to diagnose and fix QuickBooks errors. Comprehensive: From network issues to installation problems, the Tool Hub covers it all. No more jumping between different applications or support forums.  
    • Ehh NYR had more scoring opportunities and Florida is healthy with an elite net minder. Only fault I have on Rod is his goalie decision. At some point, the players deserve some balme. 
    • I went to McDonald's at lunch got a combo for $12. It was ok. The next day I ordered lunch from Cracker Barrel got the broccoli cheddar chicken, steak fries, and 2 biscuits paid $12 with tip. Guess which was better. 
×
×
  • Create New...