Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tropical Storm Ian


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

That is some low damn country in there and all the sea islands as well.  Even a reduced strength storm will hit them hard.  

 ventusky is an interesting site and now one of my bookmarks 

I have been using ventusky for years.  They are almost always ahead of NOAA by a day.

This storm is going to soak South East.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ventusky doesn't have its own models or forecasts, it animates the data generated by models like ICON or GFS.  If you look in the bottom left there's a dropdown box to choose which one you want.

The National Hurricane Center generates its forecasts based on an aggregate of like four or five different models, so if one model is way off what the others are predicting it won't be reflected in the track until the others come to a consensus.  GFS and ECMWF which are two of the other main models NOAA uses haven't predicted as wild of a swing east as ICON has yet, although it seems to be creeping that way.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as impacts on SC go it's pretty much just going to come down to last second "wobbles", slight alterations in the track that occur naturally.  Wobbles like this are what saved Lake Charles from getting the worst of Laura a few years back. The more time it spends over sea, the more severe the impacts will be because it'll give it more time over warm sea surface tempuratures to strengthen so any shift to the east will help it develop further after re-emergence. The models seem to be split on just how long it's actually going to spend over sea if it even re-emerges at all.  Each model is an individual run and models are incorrect all the time which is why the NHC uses an aggregate of multiple, reliable models rather than just taking one as the word of god. That is what their cones/forecasts consist of.

The ICON, a model which has been quite reliable so far with regards to this particular storm, thinks it'll re-emerge and strengthen significantly in approach to SC into probably a major.  To my knowledge the ICON is the most "radical" of the models at the moment. The EURO also seems to be in favor of re-emergence but as a much weaker system, probably a TS or low end Cat 1. The storm has already shifted east quite a lot from initial projections. It's a bit far out to know for sure, just have to wait and see.

EURO on top, ICON on bottom.ecmwf_mslp_pcpn_us_fh3-99.thumb.gif.becbd06cf748ce91c3fa148070a3beaa.gif
icon_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_fh3-69.thumb.gif.30b18335a2557c00dd0be42822ade206.gif

Edited by beo
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worst case scenario for this would probably be it going north east into Fort Myers or something and then re-emerging over which seems to be what things are trending towards... ;/ undergoing an eyewall replacement cycle atm but man this thing looks like it's starting to head more easterly as seen at the very end of this loop. Interested to see what it looks like at 11. 233187950_image0(2).thumb.gif.51bef03ab9945142ddab44709e996c1d.gif

Wind steering layers pointing it quite far east as well(these "guide" hurricanes along their path a good bit of the time):
IMG_1030.gif.ed16a5fd1b2678434ceb5cdebabfe1ca.gif

This isn't good for Florida either. That part of the state wasn't preparing to get the brunt of it, that was more focused up in Tampa. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Regardless of how we got here, any rational fan should be excited by how well Bryce played down the stretch. Anyone not happy about that level of play either doesn't know what they're looking at, or they're still trying to drive tired narratives. Obviously, Cam had an all-time rookie season, and I'm not putting the two in the same basket yet, but as someone who has watched every snap of Panthers football since the start of the new millennium (Im old), Bryce was playing at a higher level at the end of 2024 than Cam was at the end of 2012 (his 2nd season). Cam continued to develop into MVP form, something Bryce has to prove, but as someone who watched both (and will stan for Cam always), Bryce was playing at a higher level to end year 2 than Cam did.  Go watch the film if you dont believe me. None of that means anything for the future. But the people who said BY9 couldnt play in this league are wrong.   That being said, the only thing that matters is this year. #20 is perfectly fair IMO going into the season. I mean think about it, how would you rank him??!  His in-season turnaround is one of the wildest things I've ever seen... how do you rank a guy who looked like a massive bust in September and by January was consistently playing at a top 10 level? My excitement level is pretty damn high heading into this season. There were throws from the Chiefs game onward where Bryce had Drew Brees levels of anticipation. Im excited to see what he can do with a full deck on offense, something we really never gave Cam. Really hope and expect Bryce to move up this list this season.  
    • Not really, the only QB's (other than Anthony Richardson) ranked below him are new to their teams as a placeholder starter or drafted in 2024 or 2025, not a lot of gymnastics to get there. It's not about how many that is, if it's 20, 12, or 2... It means there isn't a QB who's team has committed to them for the long term right now that they have ranked below Bryce. That's not a great thing.
    • The changes to onside kicks were ridiculous and ruined a significant part of the game     It was already a high risk low reward play.  Why change it?
×
×
  • Create New...