Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Cardinals at Panthers GameDay Thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Its a big pile of shlt.  The O is nonexistent.  We probably have the worst O in the NFL.  Baker's play is ass. 

Those predicting the Baker/McAdoo experiment would fail have been right  and even if it eventually turns around, it will be too late to save the season.   

Those praying for losses and a tank are getting their wish.

 

Edited by poundaway
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, poundaway said:

Its a big pile of shlt.  The O is nonexistent.  We probably have the worst O in the NFL.  Baker's play is ass. 

Those predicting the Baker/McAdoo experiment would fail have been right  and even if it eventually turns it around, it will be too late to save the season.   

Those praying for losses and a tank are getting their wish.

 

but hey hows that preseason optimism working out for you?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cam Lawter said:

How many times are we going to blame the quarterback without holding Rhule accountable. We already sacrificed OC, Bridgewater, Darnold, and now you guys want to sacrifice Baker. Our offensive problems, discipline, and playcalling hasn't changed an inch from any of the new hires. IT's RHULE!

Baker was not wanted by any desperate team that needed  a QB....flag one....i missed it.... MaCafuk was not wanted by anyone either..flag 2....Gee why do we suck...it was a nice try...with what was available.... its only a matter of time before the locker room gets disgruntled .....and gives up on this sht....DJ already has....its a natural evolution to getting rid of fhule.... unless bonehead tepper keeps the course...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Cam Lawter said:

How many times are we going to blame the quarterback without holding Rhule accountable. We already sacrificed Brady, Bridgewater, Darnold, and now you guys want to sacrifice Baker. Our offensive problems, discipline, and playcalling hasn't changed an inch from any of the new hires. IT's RHULE!

...i was on the mayfield bandwagon....He blows...even Cle knew it..why they paid 230m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Personally, I don't blame them for trying Mayfield. 

But the qb decisions have been bad from the start of Rhule's reign and that is what has doomed him.  Mayfield is not the worst decision, just the latest in a series of bad decisions.  

...he was best available...I get it...when ur swingin for a qb...he was next in line...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...