Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The crazy thing is we would be 3-0 with Cam Newton


OneBadCat
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, OneBadCat said:

Just proof that egos run the NFL. 
 

You can’t tell me that Cam wouldn’t fair better than this. Hell he already did after being signed off his couch. 
 

All of our passes are PA and rollouts because Baker can’t throw over singleback formation without being batted down. 

Cam would at least be keeping this defense fresh with automatic 3rd/4th and short conversions.

The line is significantly better than last year. Cam would have feasted. But  Rhule is determined to outsmart himself out of a job for some reason.

 

Moreover Cam was cool and collected and made the right reads more often than not. Cam also has the swag and clutch factor. Darnold is a chicken poo and Baker is a nervous train wreck guessing whether it’s okay the throw ball because of his height .

Give me all the poo because I’m still right. We keep assembling rosters that Cam would have succeeded with and Rhule continues to think he knows better. 

Hell last week we ran RPO all game like Baker is some kind of duel threat. None of this poo makes sense. 

lol here we go again

Edited by Barney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, OriginalPD said:

This dude gets it. Winning doesn’t seem to be an option for this franchise, so at least bring in Cam so we can HOPE something is fun to watch. 

Is there such a thing as fun while losing......or does the fun while you still loose just make the whole thing more pathetic? 

Or is there such a thing as boring winners?........is winning ever not fun for fans of sports?

I guess in your defense Cub fans for many decades always enjoyed their "lovable loosers" and battle cry of "wait until next year!"........but that's based on the fact they will be winners then..........

That stated, I don't know if the NFL has the same level of tolerance that MLB has seen having a team of lovable loosers.....................maybe Browns fans pre move to Baltimore felt that way?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PghPanther said:

Is there such a thing as fun while losing......or does the fun while you still loose just make the whole thing more pathetic? 

Or is there such a thing as boring winners?........is winning ever not fun for fans of sports?

I guess in your defense Cub fans for many decades always enjoyed their "lovable loosers" and battle cry of "wait until next year!"........but that's based on the fact they will be winners then..........

That stated, I don't know if the NFL has the same level of tolerance that MLB has seen having a team of lovable loosers.....................maybe Browns fans pre move to Baltimore felt that way?

 

 

 

No, losing isn’t fun at all. Just would hope that at least a couple times per game there’d be something exciting to happen on offense. Mayfield can’t deliver that. Cam might be able to at least. Cam is past his prime, but he’s anything but boring to watch. I’ll take that at least. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, AceBoogie said:

I’ve long said I’d rather lose with our guy than lose with these other guys. It should have always been Cam until we found our guy in the draft. I still refuse to believe a Cam with a full offseason wouldn’t be better than what we’ve gotten these last few years. 

I was in the barbershop talking sh*t  a few months after they cut Cam. This guy was like man you don't like Teddy Bridgewater? Man he's pretty good. My response was dude in his best passing statistical season he didn't pass for as many touchdowns as Cam ran for in his MVP season. Everybody's eyes got big like damn I didn't know that and then I stirred the conversation towards the Eagles cause I was seeing red. Easily the most disrespected MVP ever!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I will say this. Rhule and McAdoo system doesnt work for Cam. Long winded routes with no ability to create after the route. The WRs do not look for holes in the zone. They run their routes and stop alot. Saying this. I think Cams ability to escape the pocket wouldve given us a better 3rd down conversion rate and we would be more run heavy then passive with RPO not just PO's (Like Smitty said). I think he couldve accounted for atleast 1 TD per game especially since our defense has scored twice. Looking at the scores other than the last game. We were in  those games. We won 1 and lost 2 by a FG or less. So I say we atleats be 3-2 or 4-1 at this point with Cam.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam is like your favorite ex girlfriend that you always look back and remember fondly. She was the MVP. The best you ever had. And you almost made it all the way. But those days are over and it’s just time to let it go. I still think about mine. But it’s not really worth bringing her up to my friends anymore. She’s moved on. So have I. So should you. Let Cam go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My very UNPOPULAR opinion:   First, I would want to know the locker room.  Have they turned on Canales?  If not, I would stay with him.  Here is why: Switching coaches every year or two is not the answer to long term success.  We are chasing hope instead of building a program around a young coach.  There were not many applicants for this job and if you think they are suddenly dying to be here now, that MIGHT justify a coaching change Canales has made some tough decisions (like benching Bryce), but his weaknesses (the team's weaknesses) have been in the areas in which we have neglected or sucked for years.  Who did we get for CMC?  Who made the trade with the Bears when we had no idea at the time who we wanted?  Who drafted Mingo, Marshall, XL, etc.?  Who signed a frequently-injured CB to the biggest contract in NFL history at the time for a CB?  I look at the personnel decisions and the play calling.  Our edge players are injured and not that good when healthy. He played Johnson because he had nothing left.  Johnson was terrible Sunday.  He has nothing at LB and two starting OL are now out.  XL is pouting because he does not seem to have paid the price to be paid the price of a first round pick.  AT was sent packing.  Bryce's resurgence last year may have been Canales and not Bryce. Evero still does not have the tools he needs to succeed--on the field or perhaps between his ears.   If Canales fires Evero, he is probably doing the right thing.  Remember, we had a lot of money in dead cap when Canales took over.  Fitterer was the worst GM since Matt Millen in the NFL, and we have sucked recently in the first round of the draft (Bryce, XL) until this season.   When the GM is trying to give the coach what he needs to be successful and you keep changing coaches, it is difficult.   I think this--stay with Canales, but bring in a veteran DC.  Some argue that Canales needs to move on from Bryce, but this team is not set up to give him options.  Andy aint the answer.  We never seem to take the PS QB seriously--all eggs are in one basket.  Canales needs options. This team needs to address the QB situation.  Bryce's best games are not Lombardi worthy, so move on.  He is not the Alpha a young coach needs on the field.  Give him options at QB, some LBs and a good coordinator on defense, and I think we could use another stud WR.  It is time to start drafting developmental OL and start grooming them to replace our aging OL. This draft is solid at QB as it stands now.  We need to focus on drafting the right guy and signing a veteran backup who is not the starting QB's BFF.  Compete.  Heck, i have no problem doing what Cleveland did--draft a QB in round 1 and then another QB if one falls into day 3.   I think we need stability and I am not confident any respectable coach comes to Carolina.  Canales is frustrated, but the front office has failed him, as have injuries, and a really bad draft a few years ago that brought them Bryce.  He was hired to fix Bryce--so I say neuter him so he does not sire any more 5'8" QBs.   Canales is better that Rivera was--Canales just has so much less talent.  Rivera was coach of the year a few times because he had Cam Newton, but could never put two winning seasons together.  That is a crime.
    • The Tepper move is 100% to want Belichick thinking that fixes our problems after striking out so much Let's see how much more he can screw up the franchise when JordON and Nicole are assistant GMs
×
×
  • Create New...