Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Realistic question: if playcalling could be taken from McAdoo, who would you have call plays?

AlphabetsEnd

By AlphabetsEnd,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

AlphabetsEnd Rising Star

AlphabetsEnd

Posted
Posted

I can't get over the play calling on offense, through all four games, and especially the way the offense has looked when the pressure of the clock is applied to it. 

In a hypothetical, if McAdoo isn't replaced, but is retained, who takes over playcalling? Is anyone on staff an improvement? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pimpdaddy Grand Master

Pimpdaddy

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, AlphabetsEnd said:

I can't get over the play calling on offense, through all four games, and especially the way the offense has looked when the pressure of the clock is applied to it. 

In a hypothetical, if McAdoo isn't replaced, but is retained, who takes over playcalling? Is anyone on staff an improvement? 

....me...I can draw up sht in the dirt better than him...

Edited by Pimpdaddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      Be careful what you wish for

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      Well, Hooker was a guy that was drafted in the 3rd round pick sitting behind a well established starter yet Detroit somehow saw enough to let him go after two offseasons.  Where does that fit into your ideal situation?
    • TD alt
      Be careful what you wish for

      By TD alt · Posted

      Like that matters. That's the first thing. I suggested that it's probably better to let a QB sit and learn, and that's what I meant. Secondly, in what planet am I making excuses, my friend, or engaging in any mental gymnastics in Bryce Young's defense? As I have said, I don't care if he turns into Mighty Mouse, it's time for him to go. In my opinion, he's too short to be a successful QB in the NFL. I have seen enough. I'd rather trade him and take my chances with Hooker, at least he's more of a prototypical size and can actually see where and why he's throwing the ball.
    • ok2h8pep
      About that schedule.

      By ok2h8pep · Posted

      There is a scenario where our team comes out prepared to play football instead of shitting the bed for the first quarter. Every bad Bryce game seems to start with him looking incompetent - the OL looking incompetent - and the defense looking incompetent.  Boom, down 14 before we know what hit us. Imagine a world where we come prepared and play with a lead, and Bryce gets to fulfill his ceiling by managing a game instead of playing catch up. He's bad, but upon reflection he is not Clausen bad.  He can move the team down the field when he gets 4 - 5 seconds in a clean pocket against a soft zone.  I don't think Clausen could do that.
×
×
  • Create New...