Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Robbie may have been the FOOL but DJ was out there GOING THROUGH THE MOTIONS

TheBigKat

By TheBigKat,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

The big difference between Steve Smith and DJ is that for better or worse Smitty always believed he could take over a game if called on and he’d get frustrated at his teammates for not coming with that same energy. DJ is talented and has been dealt a bad hand, but instead of trying to overcome the situation he checks out when the going gets rough.
 

WR1 has to be a constant threat to blow the game up. He’d be happier and more productive as the #2 or 3 on a team where he just does his job and clocks out for the day. The Panthers need more out of him than that.

I have never thought Moore should be a WR1 on any team. That's just not who or what he is.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

Can we please not judge DJ when he's had these QBs throwing to him?  He put up good seasons with bad QBs but it hit a head eventually.  This is the worst offensive in the league and possibly in Panthers history.  If we didn't have CMC getting yards out of pure willpower it would be.  Robbie is just bad.  Last year he led the league in drops and while Darnold is obviously a bad QB, he would have had a lot more success if Robbie could catch a ball.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NorthTryon Mentor

NorthTryon

Posted
Posted

DJ has had three 1K yard receiving seasons the past three years all with a revolving door at QB. This thread is noodles. And the emotional, fanatic, short sighted, lack of football knowledge responses are exposing so many posters. The game plan yesterday was very close to the Wildcat game plan in Atlanta as far as WR involvement was concerned and there is thread about DJ Moore's effort. This board sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...