Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PJ Passing Chart - Next Gen Stats


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Proudiddy said:

It's also why I'm not mad at Robby.  He flipped out because he knew they were throwing the game...  Again, indefensible and inexcusable.  And Wilks didn't even try to put lipstick on it, he straight up said its what they decided to do.

It certainly looked like were trying to lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, poundaway said:

From Wilks' presser after the game.

What can you build on?
 

A: Number one our identity which we somewhat established a little bit today on the offensive side.

Well they did kinda sorta established that they can inddeed actually run the football after all.  Granted it wasn't much to write home about. But that McCaffrey fellow is pretty good a football so it's a little slanted in his favor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, top dawg said:

It' s indefensible, yet you have some attempting to tell me that it was an NFL-level game plan. That's something you might consider doing if you're down to your emergency QB, not a professional QB. 

PJ is an emergency QB. He is a XFL or NFL practice squad guy. That’s literally his history. Don’t let Rhule’s cronyism or some weird ass teenage posters here fool you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, onmyown said:

PJ is an emergency QB. He is a XFL or NFL practice squad guy. That’s literally his history. Don’t let Rhule’s cronyism or some weird ass teenage posters here fool you.

Yet a newb OC that wasn’t even qualified figured out to get PJ to throw a forward pass….and we won both games.  PJ sucks.  PJ sucking doesn’t justify the Panthers acting like a Carolina huddle poster was suited up. 
 

PJ sucks.  The staff did a horrible job on Sunday.  2 things can be true

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...