Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Burns is probably going to be traded right?


firefox1234
 Share

Recommended Posts

no

And even if he did he wouldn't go for a first. He's got 1 year of a contract left and hes not gonna change a defense hard enough to warrant it, even by analytics standards too.

we got a 2nd, 3rd and 4th for a HB everyone knew we were trading on a bad contract from a bad offense and now everyone acts like we're in burn it to the ground mode.

Edited by Rags
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rags said:

no

And even if he did he wouldn't go for a first. He's got 1 year of a contract left and hes not gonna change a defense hard enough to warrant it, even by analytics standards too.

we got a 2nd, 3rd and 4th for a HB everyone knew we were trading on a bad contract from a bad offense and now everyone acts like we're in burn it to the ground mode.

Unless we go ham to resign Burns why stay when free agency would be his best career path?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, firefox1234 said:

To what end? So we can trade him for chump change?

He could get injured and miss the rest of the season, and someone would still give up a first rounder for him in the offseason if we tag him.

He's a 24 year old elite pass rusher, he could be that for another 8-10 years.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think we want to ship him but I doubt he wants to stay here. So we’ll see how that shakes out. 

Would hate to tag him or have him just sign elsewhere and we gets comps.

If he refuses an extension, we may need to if we want any sort of gain from him leaving.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No saying he mostly sucks is saying that he doesn’t suck the minority of the time.   Like if he took 17 tests and had a couple of really good showings and a handful of pretty good scores sprinkled in among the typical sub par results.   Like a golfer who went out and shot an 89.  There will be some real nice shots sprinkled in there but at the end of the day it is still 89.    
    • It's worth mentioning... Game 1: Oct 11 in Raleigh. 4-3 OT win with a complete starting lineup. Game 2: Dec 13 in Philly. 4-3 SO win without Jaccob Slavin. Game 3: Dec 14 in Raleigh. 3-2 SO win with a complete starting lineup. Game 4: Apr 13 in Philly. 3-2 SO loss with the AHL roster.  Those early season games were no indication of the Canes team that finished the season. Miller and Ehlers were still trying to figure things out, Nikishin was still a work in progress and the Stankoven line was just another line. Make no mistake, the Canes team Philly will see is nothing close to what they saw at any point in the season. If the top line starts producing, Freddie stays hot and the blue line does what it does, this could be a sweep as well.   
    • He is an employee of the team and speaking on the team's official channel. They arent critical of anything ever.
×
×
  • Create New...