Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC Trade Grades


UNCrules2187
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

This team does get high impact players from time to time Like JStew and CMC but it seems like a once in a blue moon thing.

We have had a lot of good RB's over the years. It's just that in the modern era that position is somewhat devalued due to the dramatic shift in league offensive philosophies. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Ouch.  Well, on the bright side they both gave the Jets a pretty accurate grade. 

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Draft picks in quantity does not guarantee we can get any top players that will transition to the NFL and become stars. 

That’s why we need people who know what to look for and what to scout for. Instead of people like Rhule who were way in over their head.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, poundaway said:

 So are you saying CMC didn't have the most receiving yards on the team?  Because you were arguing that he was just a RB, and those apparently are a dime a dozen.

The best receiver in an offense that is ranked 32nd in Yardage and 29th in Receiving Yardage?

My....whatever will we do.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The trade being good and fans being justifiably upset are not mutually exclusive. Was this good compensation for CMC that will help us do an actual rebuild? Yes, and that's the right move for the situation we find ourselves in. 

 

But if you're not livid that the team has been mismanaged so badly that we're staring down a completely lost season, a total rebuild and likely several seasons before we have a chance to compete again then you're not as invested in this team as I am. 

 

The REAL problem is this trade should have been made when we decided to end the Cam/Rivera era, followed by a better HC hire and drafting of a QB in 2020. We would already be done with that rebuild. Instead we lost three seasons with Rhule...

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, poundaway said:

 So are you saying CMC didn't have the most receiving yards on the team?  Because you were arguing that he was just a RB, and those apparently are a dime a dozen.

That’s mainly because we’ve had such terrible QB play they simply check down more than they try to get the ball downfield accurately. It’s not a recipe for success as we have all seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...