Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other Games


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Varking said:

If the Bears score 5 points the rest of the game they will have scored more than we have in any game this year. 
 

And Fields is responsible for over 200 yards in the first half. 

If and when and one game a lot of guys look good in a game or two a season it doesn't change they don't even average 16ppg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

We get it bro. You like fields.  My brother n law loves the bears so we watch a lot of games. Fields has been trash last year and just as bad this year. Bears fans aren’t sold on him and already want a new qb. But it’s ok.  Like who you like man. 

Peyton Manning would have been garbage in a zone read heavy O.  Cam Newton would have been garbage in Tom Brady’s late Patriot scheme. 

Fields hasn’t been good.  But the Bears have done him little favors overall since drafting him.  I mean he is running tonight but overall the O has never been catered to his strengths

where you get drafted has a lot to do with your ability to have success 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Peyton Manning would have been garbage in a zone read heavy O.  Cam Newton would have been garbage in Tom Brady’s late Patriot scheme. 

Fields hasn’t been good.  But the Bears have done him little favors overall since drafting him. 

where you get drafted has a lot to do with your ability to have success 

Fun fact his 2 starting tackles were 5th round picks (and it shows).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Peyton Manning would have been garbage in a zone read heavy O.  Cam Newton would have been garbage in Tom Brady’s late Patriot scheme. 

Fields hasn’t been good.  But the Bears have done him little favors overall since drafting him.  I mean he is running tonight but overall the O has never been catered to his strengths

where you get drafted has a lot to do with your ability to have success 

Not sure what the Nagy administration was thinking, but it feels like the Eberflus staff is gonna make him fit their system rather than shaping the system for him.  And if that doesn't work they'll probably look for a new QB.  Just my speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

Peyton Manning would have been garbage in a zone read heavy O.  Cam Newton would have been garbage in Tom Brady’s late Patriot scheme. 

Fields hasn’t been good.  But the Bears have done him little favors overall since drafting him.  I mean he is running tonight but overall the O has never been catered to his strengths

where you get drafted has a lot to do with your ability to have success 

When you keep spending huge resources on QBs and they all suck, it might not be all the QBs' fault.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...