Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Win or Tank?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, Zod said:

Are you pulling for a win on Sunday or are you in full tank mode still?

I was just wishing for this very thread. 

“You play to win the game.” - Dennis Green

if we were 2&5 in the NFC North, the answer, “Tank” would be easier.  However, we are 2&5 in the NFC South.  A win this weekend will make us tied for first place.

If you look at the Saints forms, their  attitude is, “Win baby win!” However, they cautiously point out that they would be weak in the Playoffs.  They could be one and done in the playoffs.

The mistake that I see many fan bases make is, fans think everything Is Absolute.  If it was absolute,  we don’t have to bother going to the games after ESPN makes their predictions.  Nothing is absolute, so we have to use statistics and probability.

That first round draft pick could be either a gem or a bust.  By the way, Chad Kelly is probably currently sitting in a strangers house sitting on the strangers sofa and watching the strangers television, as we speak.

How many times, have we seen a weak team suddenly become hot during the later part of the season.

Bottom line is, I would not want to make this decision. It could go either way.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

The way I look at it we're going to draft a QB next year high in the 1st round regardless. The only question is do we have to give up a bunch of picks to trade up to get him or do we end up picking top-3/5 from the start.

I'll never root against this team; it's just not in me. But I can't help but to feel like it's by far in our best interest to not have to give up a bunch of picks to trade up for Will Levis, C.J. Stroud, or Bryce Young.

At this point I guess I'm just along for the ride. It'll be what it ends up being. At least Rhule is gone.

This is me except I have no problem saying it's ok for them to lose out.

2 hours ago, grimesgoat said:

Too early to tank.

 

Just need SF to continue to lose.

 

There's some really bad teams in the NFL this year, so if you want your guy in the draft, you have to be the worst team in the league. Hoping SF keeps getting worse isn't something to hang your hat on either. It's not like they gave their first rounder for CMC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, roaddog96 said:

Nope, they were just that bad. Fired Marvin Lewis and hired Zac Taylor. Dalton was terrible and they started 0-11 that year. That was when everyone thought Chase Young would be the #1 pick. Burrow wasn’t talked about at that point as the hands down #1 pick until after LSU beat Clemson in the NC game if memory serves me correct.

That's weird, because a lot of people have the impression they finally tanked after treading water for years with a mediocre quarterback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is really bizarre here is that if the Panther win it could set the pace to actually win this division.........and if they lose it could have just the opposite effect. 

This game as crazy as it sounds is as close to a playoff game that could ever be seeing it is occurring in the middle of the season.............that's just strange to think of it that way but it could determine is where the road heads in this division.

A playoff implication game by two losing teams in week 8..................strange

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...