Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So, no love to Henderson


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He has at least one WTF play every game.   I seriously doubt we pick up his 5th year option and he is probably off the team next year.  His play is easily replaceable 

That's my thing with him, and it is a pull your hair out WTF play. Also, his issues make you really angry because they seem like a lack of attention to detail. He will just be completely coasting and give up a huge play. I'll be looking like what was he doing, thinking, see? It boggles the mind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, top dawg said:

C.J. Henderson had great coverage and an even better interception on what should've been the origin of the winning drive. He deserves a little respect this morning.

If you're going to give Moore praise for redeeming himself, you should give Henderson some praise for redeeming himself. That was a magnificent play.

 

I got nothing for him, he made a play that he is capable of.  The bad part of that is his complete lack of effort and football IQ 99% of the time outside of that.  The play just makes it all the more frustrating since he has the talent, but none of the effort or brains.

Useless trade, he should not be on this team.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, CRA said:

his ratio of good to bad IMO is still too heavily skewed to the bad. 

It was a nice pick.  Lot of bad players make a great play here or there.  

 

Bad players don't make great plays. Bad players are on a couch somewhere, not on an NFL team. Let alone, lots of them.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...