Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rams Offering Two (Future) Firsts for Burns


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Zappy said:

Pep first four seasons had 40.5 sacks

Burns has 30.5 currently in his fourth season with 9 games left

Put some respect on BB

4 seasons in

Peppers was ROY, Pro Bowler, All Pro.  4th for DPOY.    

He also wasn't a pass rush specialist.  He was an everything specialist.    Forced fumbles, passes defended, blocked kicks, you name it.   Basically anything you can do on a football field - advantage Peppers.  Burns ain't bringing that package to the table.  It isn't close. 

Don't be disrespectful to what will be our first 1st ballot HOFer.  The only one we have drafted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Zappy said:

Pep first four seasons had 40.5 sacks

Burns has 30.5 currently in his fourth season with 9 games left

Put some respect on BB

Lol in way less games Peppers had 10 more sack without looking about twice as many forced fumbles including a 60yd td, 3 interceptions including a 97 yd pick 6. 

 

LMFAO Burns doesn't belong in the same sentence as Peppers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's just not how grading assets in the NFL works. Not when one bad season can get your butt fired as a coach or GM Outside of a small handful of truly entrenched guys.

And how are draft picks going to "appreciate"? 😂 We aren't talking about stocks or bonds here.

Same concept.  If a draft choice today is valued as a second, and next year the same pick is valued as a first, what would you call it?  That pick is just sitting around gaining value - just like an investment.  The gain could be volatile depending on how the underlying company (Rams) performs, but you should still see a gain in value.

I understand present values and the time value of money.  The question is, can you use two future firsts to invest in order to surpass Brian Burns' net (after cost) production over the next 8-10 years?

I bet a good GM could.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Lol in way less games Peppers had 10 more sack without looking about twice as many forced fumbles including a 60yd td, 3 interceptions including a 97 yd pick 6. 

 

LMFAO Burns doesn't belong in the same sentence as Peppers.

No he doesn't but very few in the history of the NFL do. He's #5 on the NFL's all-time sack leaders list for a reason.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, grimesgoat said:

Same concept.  If a draft choice today is valued as a second, and next year the same pick is valued as a first, what would you call it?  That pick is just sitting around gaining value - just like an investment.  The gain could be volatile depending on how the underlying company (Rams) performs, but you should still see a gain in value.

😂

It's not "gaining" anything. The value of the pick is devalued because the return is not immediate and there's the uncertainty of where the pick will fall within the round. That doesn't mean that it gains real value like a bond maturing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No he doesn't but very few in the history of the NFL do. He's #5 on the NFL's all-time sack leaders list for a reason.

#2 all time blocked kicks

#2 all time in forced fumbles. 

Crazy stuff. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

😂

It's not "gaining" anything. The value of the pick is devalued because the return is not immediate and there's the uncertainty of where the pick will fall within the round. That doesn't mean that it gains real value like a bond maturing.

So the Giants would have been better off taking pick 39 in the 2021 draft than taking a next year’s 1st which wound up being 7th overall. Those Rams picks can be used to acquire other players at any time as well. 

  If your GM is making deals with self- preservation in mind, and not what’s the best value for the team, there is already much bigger issues. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toomers said:

So the Giants would have been better off taking pick 39 in the 2021 draft than taking a next year’s 1st which wound up being 7th overall. Those Rams picks can be used to acquire other players at any time as well. 

  If your GM is making deals with self- preservation in mind, and not what’s the best value for the team, there is already much bigger issues. 

Don't hate the player, hate the game. If you were in that seat you'd be thinking self preservation too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I understand the concerns--he is not P. Sewell or Joe Thomas.  He has technique issues and was not great in the run game and was good in pass protection when UGA did not pass much.  Then there is the immediate need vs long term need perspective.   I did not see Freeland being there-frankly. Here is why:   He has nearly 35" arms and his hands are large (10.5").  He ran a 4.93 40 at the combine.  He is very agile.  His vertical was 33.5".   Physically, he is a freak. He is 21 and he seems very intelligent (coachable). You have to remember, some of these rookies are 24, 25 years old. Freeling is A team player.  His shortcomings are fixable.  Short arms (as with the kids from Utah and Miami) are not fixable.  The Run on OTs began at #9: Fano (picked 10 picks earlier) has 32" arms and his hands are 9".  He did not play in the SEC like Freeling.  Many think the short arms project him to guard. Mauigoa (picked 10th) has 33" arms.  He is a solid player, but his arms make him borderline as a T (they seek 34" and up as ideal)  Kayden Proctor (picked 12th overall) struggled in pass protection and projects by many to RT or G.  Weight management is a concern. So it is possible that Freeling will be the first LT taken who actually plays LT.  (he also has the ability and experience to play RT)  His questions are fixable and not limited to physical limitations.  Here is the question:  If you know that you need a Tackle, and you could choose between all four of these players, who would you pick? I am not sure that Freeling would not be the player I selected if given the opportunity to take any of them.
    • The more I think about this pick the more I like it. The Icky injury might end up being a blessing in disguise for everyone except Icky unfortunately. If Freeling pans out at LT the Panthers have a good player on a rookie contract at a premium position at a time when they’re going to need to potentially pay Bryce for his next contract. Icky was likely going to command a big salary jump for his next contract and now, there’s a strong justification he’s not going to be worth a big money extension until he rehabs and proves he can still play at a high level. Since he’s finishing his rookie deal this season, it will be interesting to see if the Panthers bring him back for the 2027 season. Obviously it’s too early to say and they will probably wait to see how the season pans out with Moton still elite but aging and clearly battling persistent injuries, and they need to see if Freeling can develop into a starter during his rookie year. But ultimately this might have opened up a huge chunk of salary cap for the next 4-5 years. 
    • You read my mind Nastradamus! If Rodriguez is still there I feel like it will be hard to pass on him. And one of these TE we keep drafting have to hit eventually and Delp is just as good as the others.
×
×
  • Create New...