Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

what's more important? early draft pick to hopefully get a stud QB or getting the best HC possible?


rayzor
 Share

Forced to choose, is a QB or HC more important to the success of the team.   

58 members have voted

  1. 1. which would help a team more?

    • Great HC with decent QB
      41
    • Decent HC with top tier QB
      14
    • Just happy to vote and ok with either.
      3


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jackie Lee said:

McDaniels did turn that Colts job down right? I think that was fairly desirable until Luck retired abruptly lol

Yeah, the point I was making that there has been a scenario where a coach turned down a job bc of the situation. Meaning it can happen.

 

Andrew Luck retired the year before this though. So that was already on the table. 

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Storied franchises, Like the Cowboys, Packers,  etc.... never have a problem attracting head coaching talent. Not saying they always select the right ones, but there is never a shortage of coaching talent for them to choose from no.matter how bad their team may actually be. 

The Panthers will NEVER be in that situation.  

To answer the OP, there is no question,  getting a great HC is like being flush with trump cards. 

The quartback position will never be as easy as people think it should be. 

Getting the HC and coaching staff correct is paramount.  

They can build a talented team, and acquiring talented potential star QB doesn't require tanking to achieve, ever. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Good coaches not wanting to go to bad situations is a myth.  

It happens on an annual basis. Brian Daboll, for example, had multiple interviews last offseason and chose the Giants as his best option.

Some coaches decline even to be interviewed. When Rhule was looking for staff, Pep Hamilton was offered an interview but turned it down...and decided to stay with the Texans.

Yes, guys who have options will take the better option. Not sure why that would surprise anybody.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

QB.

And it's not close. 

An awful HC can hamstring your team's ability to compete. A brilliant HC can make your team somewhat more competitive, but the reality is most fall into a range of not brilliant, not awful, but acceptable. Finding a coach who falls into this category is not especially difficult. Getting a top tier QB is orders of magnitude harder because it's orders of magnitude more a crapshoot. The impact that player has on your record is also far greater than all but a few possible coaching options.

The post Tom Brady Patriots make it abundantly clear that Brady was the far bigger factor in the team's success over those years than Bellicheat ever was. 

Sean Payton didn't look like an offensive genius without Brees.

Mike Tomlin has a SB ring, but hardly looks like a world beater without Big Ben.

Get rid of a quarterback and you can sign, draft or trade for another one the following season.

Fire a coach and you have to fire his assistants, remake the entire system, evaluate whether the guys you have on roster will fit the next coach and a dozen other things.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It happens on an annual basis. Brian Daboll, for example, had multiple interviews last offseason and chose the Giants as his best option.

Some coaches decline even to be interviewed. When Rhule was looking for staff, Pep Hamilton was offered an interview but turned it down...and decided to stay with the Texans.

Yes, guys who have options will take the better option. Not sure why that would surprise anybody.

You do realize a interview is different then a job offer right?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coaching first. This isn't basketball. The best college QB ain't doing a damn thing on his own in the NFL. 

Jerry Richardson pulled the plug that year and induced the tank but it was more his act of defiance during the labor dust up. That got the #1 pick. The Panthers historically have never been in that position because although JR would spend money every other season the franchise stayed away from the bottom.

Some people want to crash the ship into a rock wall to climb all the way up for a "IF". There is no clear franchise QB this draft. There are maybes. Just like last draft. A lot of maybes. Not worth a tank.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Get rid of a quarterback and you can sign, draft or trade for another one the following season.

Fire a coach and you have to fire his assistants, remake the entire system, evaluate whether the guys you have on roster will fit the next coach and a dozen other things.

All of which is still easier than finding an above average starting QB in the NFL. If you don't think so, consider how often teams turn over their coaching staff vs how often they jettison a franchise qb during his prime.

You can sign, draft or trade for another qb the following season yes. But that is a VASTLY different thing from signing, drafting or trading for an above average performing QB.  Tepper has proven JAGs can be had by the bushel. So what? Does that get you where you want to go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Wasnt payton 5-0 with teddy bridgewater?
 

He may have been, but at that point everyone paying attention knows the Saints were winning primarily off the strength of their defense and Kamara's running.  Note the actual statement I made vs the one you most likely assigned me.  Payton did demonstrate some ability to extend his team's ability to win beyond Brees tenure, but no one called him an offensive genius watching Bridgewater, Taysum Hill and Jamies Winston sling the ball. Once Payton realized it was going to be far harder to win without a Pro Bowl QB at the helm, he walked away.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that like to use their own eyes: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
    • For a LB that is a long career.  They take a beating.  Shoulders and head.  My favorite LB of All Time--Junior Seau--had a 20-year career--the average career for a STARTING MLB is 5.6 years.  I really think Shaq is done, but if he can play, it does not mean that he should.   Think about Morgan's career--7 seasons.  Luke's career--8 seasons.  Beason played only 93 games over 10 years--only 5 seasons where he played 15 games or more.  The other 5 seasons?  No more than 5 games per.  So basically, the average starting MLB plays 90 games in his career.  Shaq has played 123 games and was pretty injury free until the last 2 seasons (6 games total). 
×
×
  • Create New...