Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule Hired as Nebraska’s New HC


Prowler2k18
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Dude, you don't have that kind of sway 😆

As for your posts, anybody can go back and read your defenses of Rhule if they want.

(I wouldn't necessarily bet on anyone being that interested though)

Once again, this thread is a perfect example of Mr. Scot seeing things as a defense of Rhule, even when I posted that he sucked, literally, that is all I said about him.

Psychotic and sad. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, poundaway said:

Once again, this thread is a perfect example of Mr. Scot seeing things as a defense of Rhule, even when I posted that he sucked, literally, that is all I said about him.

Psychotic and sad. 

You do realize your posts from this past offseason are still accessible, right? 😆

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, poundaway said:

Haven't said anything positive about him.

But go on  live in your little world.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

As for Brady, just pointing out once again, he sucked and he has literally never been a good OC anywhere at any level.

But feel free to fluff Brady.  Fluff away.

Wilkes was a genius for firing defensive and ST coaches and yet kept Mcadoo.  I really hope he gets the job next year.  It will be awesome.

What this is really about is you just can't handle that people were right about Rhule while you threw yourself in front of him as a human shield for months on end. Now you're doing the opposite with Wilks as payback. It's  plainly obvious and amusing. Have fun watching the game today friend 😉

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish him the best now he's no longer OUR head coach.  I think he will do okay at Nebraska.  Will they be a top 10 team perennially?  Probably not, but he'll at least have them getting back to winning records.  If that is enough to keep him around for 8 years remains to be seen.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

You do realize your posts from this past offseason are still accessible, right? 😆

You keep saying that.  I have many posts  saying Rhule sucked and listed his shortcomings.  I just didn't feel like piling on every single gd thread with the some  huddlers who's sheer burning hatred of Rhule lead them to attack anyone who wouldn't pledge their undying hatred of Rhule....  this thread is a perfect example.  The dude is gone, but you just go on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on.

You need help dude.  Seriously.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, frankw said:

What this is really about is you just can't handle that people were right about Rhule while you threw yourself in front of him as a human shield for months on end. Now you're doing the opposite with Wilks as payback. It's  plainly obvious and amusing. Have fun watching the game today friend 😉

I know reading is hard for you.

But I haven't posted anything positive about Rhule. 

Go back to your Nebraska threads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, poundaway said:

You keep saying that.  I have many posts  saying Rhule sucked and listed his shortcomings.  I just didn't feel like piling on every single gd thread with the some  huddlers who's sheer burning hatred of Rhule lead them to attack anyone who wouldn't pledge their undying hatred of Rhule....  this thread is a perfect example.  The dude is gone, but you just go on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on.

You need help dude.  Seriously.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Sure, kid.

All these big meanies just hate Matt Rhule for no reason. Good thing he's got you to fight back 😆

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is hard to win in the NFL. I’m never going to put an * next to a Dub.
    • We had a very favorable matchup our o-line manhandles theirs. Even Etienne looked like he would have had a great game on his limited rushing opportunities. 
    • I think that's part of the problem, he's spreading the ball around too much, many of them are the first read play calls, and on top of that, a large portion of them are purposefully called screens or other short passes. I just looked, the Cardinals are the only other team in the league right now without at least 3 players with 100+ yards receiving so far this year, with the majority of teams having 4 or more.  And even then, their #2 right now is McBride with over 200 yards. Our 2nd leading receiver this year has 108 yards (albeit with 4 more players with 82 or more). On the surface, that might not be as alarming as you might think, but when you add into it that Bryce is currently 6th in the league in pass attempts, and it's even more alarming that he hasn't gotten a 3rd player to 100 yards so far and his second highest is only 108. XL has 39 yards on 18 targets.  Renfrow has 82 yards on 24 targets.  Tremble has 87 on 16 targets.  Sanders has 92 on 14 targets. None of those are good enough, so why aren't we calling more plays with T-Mac as the first read and forcing the ball to him (and again, that's not me wanting my guy to get more targets, that's me wanting more targets for the only productive pass catcher so far this year, I'd feel the same no matter what that player's name was). All of this is why I have issues with Canales' play calling.  How do you have a player who had 73 yards in the first half and then you only give him 1 target in the 2nd half despite playing from behind the majority of that time? You can be happy about the win, happy about Dowdle getting 200 yards, but in a game where your QB threw it 30 times, I can't accept the above sentence in the same breath, that's just terrible play calling, which is on top of the already predictable play calling in general, which is also on top of boring play designs as well. Add it all up, and THAT is why I'm unhappy even after a win, not because "my guy" didn't have a bigger game.
×
×
  • Create New...