Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let’s talk Division Title


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Teddy2SuperBowlHeartBreaks said:

I'll entertain this if the Saints win next Monday

Actually it’s pretty realistic look at the next two games say they win one and loose to the 49ers id we win the next two it’s a 6-7 team compared to a 6-8 team. We beat them already so it’s closer then we think. I’d say they louse to the bengals depending on that Lions game we may be tied for first in 3 weeks with two nfc matchups left. I’m starting to think it’s a realistic thing I wasn’t rooting for this but I’d never be mad at winning regardless of what happens in the playoffs. Winning breeds winning we need to get back to that type of culture forget the Fool way seven year fiasco crap he would spew. We are playing to win games if a bad qb can do enough to win let the D and good coaching take us as far as we can go and build upon that in the offseason.

Edited by trucpfan
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a 5 win team until proven otherwise.  But I like the grit they're showing.  The offensive play calling is still ass however.  But I get it, the qbs can't string two back to back winning performances together.  But they are going to break Forman and there's nobody behind he worth a roster spot. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

Didn't we do this after the Bucs game too? The 35 point deficit in the first half against the Bengals says hello.

We don’t have another Bengals type team on the schedule. Seattle is the toughest team remaining, and they have lost back to back. One to Tampa and today to Vegas at home. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Didn't we do this after the Bucs game too? The 35 point deficit in the first half against the Bengals says hello.

Yeah but there are a LOT of bad teams and our schedule is includes several of those bad teams plus division games in which we are 2-1. It is more likely that we win the division than it is we get a top 5 pick.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...