Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Spencer Rattler ? Write up by Daniel Kelly article from Aug 31, 2022


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Has played well to end the season. 

 

Needs another year to put it all together. Arm talent is there. 

 

Biggest improvement he's made is climbing the pocket which is a really big deal at the next level. 

I sat 4th row on the home side of every game and was able to observe his demeanor. He doesn't seem to lose his cool like you would expect given his reputation. 

Right now I'd give him 4th-5th round. 

I think he could climb to the 2nd if he has a good year next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, top dawg said:

In general, I don't think that it's a good idea for us to be turning our nose up at any QB with upside.🤷🏻

that's the thing that i have to keep reminding myself of. no matter where you pick, it's going to be a gamble.

no way do i think he should be the only addition to the QB room we make in the offseason, either. as fluky as QB can be, it would be hard to justify not coming out of the draft with a couple prospects. We've got to keep swinging.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

Has played well to end the season. 

 

Needs another year to put it all together. Arm talent is there. 

 

Biggest improvement he's made is climbing the pocket which is a really big deal at the next level. 

I sat 4th row on the home side of every game and was able to observe his demeanor. He doesn't seem to lose his cool like you would expect given his reputation. 

Right now I'd give him 4th-5th round. 

I think he could climb to the 2nd if he has a good year next year. 

I hope he comes back but I don't think he will unfortunately. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

Right now I'd give him 4th-5th round. 

I think he could climb to the 2nd if he has a good year next year. 

See, this is a reasonable take by a Gamecock fan. 

Saying you would take him in the 2nd this year?  Isn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

If the new regime and GM all agree he’s the guy I don’t care where they draft him. Just get me somebody to be excited about. 

if the new regime all gets together and says Spencer Rattler at the top of the 2nd this year makes sense.  We should of just kept Matt Rhule.   You can't get excited about that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

if the new regime all gets together and says Spencer Rattler at the top of the 2nd this year makes sense.  We should have just kept Matt Rhule.   You can't get excited about that. 

 To each their own about what can or can’t excite you. I find ways to be optimistic about most things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Varking said:

 To each their own about what can or can’t excite you. I find ways to be optimistic about most things. 

DJU was once a Heisman candidate.   Let's pretend he blows up at the ACC Championship and the Bowl game with great numbers.  You going to be excited for him in the 2nd round if they tell you to be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CRA said:

DJU was once a Heisman candidate.   Let's pretend he blows up at the ACC Championship and the Bowl game with great numbers.  You going to be excited for him in the 2nd round if they tell you to be. 

Nobody can tell me what to be excited for. But yea when they get here, when we got them no longer matters. If they show some reason to be excited for, I will be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think Canales goes before Young in that scenario.
    • But that's the point, if the locker room feels that way, then you're going to upset them by still keeping Bryce around and playing him over the Top 10 pick, as opposed to bringing in a vet to start until the rookie is ready. Again, it goes one of 3 ways... 1. Bryce plays well enough to earn an extension 2. Bryce still sucks and we draft his replacement who starts Week 1 with a new QB as his backup 3. Bryce still sucks, we draft his replacement in the 1st, but they start the season backing up a new vet QB who was brought in to be his mentor. With an OUTSIDE chance at a 4th option where Bryce plays well enough to convince the team to let him play out the 5th year option and then make a decision.  Which I can't see it happening, but there is still a non zero chance of that happening I guess. The only way we draft a QB next year and still have Bryce on the roster, is if we're taking someone in the middle rounds hoping to develop them as a long term backup to Bryce.
    • I hear you. But I am not absolving Legette just because he is from my neck of the woods or anything else.  Tge comment was more about the fans uneven application of blame.  I do agree that there is a noticeable disconnect between him and the QB and that he might do better with a more polished and capable delivery man.  Abd don’t feel that they used XL right, or at least how I expected it to look.  And that could be a function of a reticent WB that shies away from that style of attack. I mean it was either him or Canales that pretty much eliminated downfield from the playbook - even while we see guys running free at times. It Could work if they commit to it.  Whoever isn’t committing. 
×
×
  • Create New...