Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How good is Brian Burns 2022 campaign?

micnificent28

By micnificent28,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Gerry Green Veteran

Gerry Green

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Toomers said:

It’s important enough for you to change your alt after being wrong about pretty much everything you have ever said. Should we take a look at some of your past rants which are very similar to the BS you’re slinging now. 

 

Ooh, good one boss

Edited by Gerry Green
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gerry Green Veteran

Gerry Green

Posted
Posted

I claimed that Burns had a slow day because no matter where he went there always seemed to be a TE to greet him. 

 

1 guy says that the Hawks play 2 TE a lot, so there was almost always going to be a TE across from Burns. Another guy says that Burns was across from Cross 70% of the time. 

 

Just one of those things that make you go hmmm?

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gerry Green Veteran

Gerry Green

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, stbugs said:

SMH. Do you read or pay attention to anything? The ANNOUNCERS said DURING THE GAME that Seattle plays TWO TEs a lot.

I just pay attention to things and I remember them correctly. You can’t remember what team had a 2000 yard back or what year a player joined a team or even what their names were and you give me crap because I actually watched the game and listened to the announcers talk about the Seahawks offensive sets? You act like you are a better football fan than draft nerds and you don’t know poo or watch the game. 😂  Why do you even try to impart you vast knowledge on anyone?

 

But @Toomers just said Burns was across from Cross 70% of the time. You both can't be right. And maybe I am too. 

 

All I said was the Burns seemed to have a TE across from him everywhere he went. And it has turned into this. 

 

It sure seems like ppl don't just want to tell you when you are wrong. They want to beat you over the head with it as well.

 

Life is too much fun for this. So, I'm out. Burns was made to have a bad day. Damm happy we won.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

But @Toomers just said Burns was across from Cross 70% of the time. You both can't be right. And maybe I am too. 

 

All I said was the Burns seemed to have a TE across from him everywhere he went. And it has turned into this. 

 

It sure seems like ppl don't just want to tell you when you are wrong. They want to beat you over the head with it as well.

 

Life is too much fun for this. So, I'm out. Burns was made to have a bad day. Damm happy we won.

They did run many 2 TE formations. Just rarely on Burns side. So we can BOTH be right. The only fiction here is your made up story about Burns facing TEs all day long. 
 

   And someone with your history of trashing anyone outside the “echo chamber of optimism” should not act like pointing out you’re wrong…again…isn’t anything more than payback. And then the usual retreat. What’s your new alt going to be? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gerry Green Veteran

Gerry Green

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Toomers said:

They did run many 2 TE formations. Just rarely on Burns side. So we can BOTH be right. The only fiction here is your made up story about Burns facing TEs all day long. 
 

   And someone with your history of trashing anyone outside the “echo chamber of optimism” should not act like pointing out you’re wrong…again…isn’t anything more than payback. And then the usual retreat. What’s your new alt going to be? 

 

Do you even remember what my original post said? I said; That it seemed like Burns was facing a TE every play. If he moved to the other side, there was a TE there waiting on him. 

 

That sure doesn't sound like a post that needs this level of animosity. But have hat it. Cuz I'm done with you.

 

Also, why do you have to be soo...hostile? You act like I done you wrong. It's a message board for crying out loud. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

Do you even remember what my original post said? I said; That it seemed like Burns was facing a TE every play. If he moved to the other side, there was a TE there waiting on him. 

 

That sure doesn't sound like a post that needs this level of animosity. But have hat it. Cuz I'm done with you.

 

Also, why do you have to be soo...hostile? You act like I done you wrong. It's a message board for crying out loud. 

Yep. Along with your telling people that you were a better fan and more knowledgeable while being completely wrong. We can still go to the tape if you like. It was a made up lie and you got called on it. Sorry about your damn luck.   

   And any hostility comes from your history. And your attempts to hide from it like a little girl. 03110A9C-D407-4450-8760-376DEB66E4D3.gif.98885d4f1eae51b9b479ecff6032ff25.gif

Edited by Toomers
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted

burns is allowed to have an "off/bad" game.....

 

not going to lie, i sure yelled at the TV about SOMEONE getting pressure on fuging geno smith........given the history.....i was expecting them to mount a comeback while begging for some sort of hurry/sack/etc...... haynes answered my call for one play, about the only one too..

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Media touting tonight as The Shedaur Show

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • kungfoodude
      Coach asked about Coker!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...