Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How good is Brian Burns 2022 campaign?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

Any of the other DE's on the roster was more than capable of doing everything Brian Burns did for us today. Not trading him for 2 1st rounders keeps looking worse and worse for you Burns huggers

It will only get worse when we have to franchise tag him for way to much money and he ends up leaving for a 3rd round comp

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This season really hasn't show me a lot more than other seasons he's had.

Is he good? Yes. Is he great? No. 

He's probably getting massively overpaid by the panthers because he's the only consistent pass rusher we have on the roster.

People are making a lot of fuss over stats and him making it over 10 Sacks when I don't notice him in some games. Especially on some key 3rd and forevers teams keep converting against us. 

Maybe it's not his fault considering lack of pass rushing help but the end result is still the same. I don't think he's ever been a game wrecker or true ace in the hole. He's ideally a very good #2 DE but he's #1 for us because of a lack of options.

 

I feel kinda similar about DJ. He's good but not great or overly dominant. Maybe not his fault mostly but whatever. I tell it how I see it.

Edited by Hoenheim
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Don’t leave

Leave where i watched the game. He had a very nice tackle for a loss on a reverse and that key pressure that ran Mitch into luvu... Disruption is production. Hes not Myles Garrett or one of those bigger multi dimensional defensive ends but he is a number 1 EDGE.

Guy is just 24 and on a Great pace. chillout. Get him some help so he cant be focused on as the only presence.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

Leave where i watched the game. He had a very nice tackle for a loss on a reverse and that key pressure that ran Mitch into luvu... Disruption is production. Hes not Myles Garrett or one of those bigger multi dimensional defensive ends but he is a number 1 EDGE.

Guy is just 24 and on a Great pace. chillout. Get him some help so he cant be focused on as the only presence.

Lol

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...