Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

HIRE WILKS


NJPanthers12
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, tgrfan01 said:

again..you are basically saying he cant lose a game..that is basically an impossible feat to set on the guy...any big named coach we hire will lose to teams we should beat as well.

No, that's saying that he can lose a couple games, but not this game. 

It's not an impossible feat. Beating the Steelers was not a  impossible feat...and if it is, then that is an even bigger red flag and reason to NOT hire him full time.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rayzor said:

He didn't have to go undefeated. 

He had to win this very winnable game with what he had....at home 

Time to move on 

I’ve supported Coach Wilks 

Today, going for field goals instead of trying to win by going for it and if it wasn’t made, pinning Pittsburgh back was a deal breaker for me 

it’s not like the panthers had anything to lose by, at last pretending to be creative on offense. 

the fact that this team had everything to play for and nothing to lose to come out flat like they did, and those with  the C on their jerseys not doing more, I’m in favor of blowing it fully up …staff, Fitterer, moving players, all of it 

both lines got beaten…the defense with all those high draft picks and the offense with a rebuilt line and they still suck

they can’t play the Falcons every week.

 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, rayzor said:

No, that's saying that he can lose a couple games, but not this game. 

It's not an impossible feat. Beating the Steelers was not a  impossible feat...and if it is, then that is an even bigger red flag and reason to NOT hire him full time.

This is the first time this year Trubisky looked like an NFL QB. Our defense was flat out abused and our vaunted run blocking OL looked like the 3 stooges. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilks has shown he can take a bad team and make them average.   That's not the same as taking an average team and making them winners.  

I love the guy and what he stands for but watching today seemed to show he's not in Tomlin's class. When a team that has everything to play for gets trucked by a team that has no real reason to win it doesn't seem to be a good sign. He clearly has more substance than Rhule but I feel the same about hiring him long term that I do about darnold.  Good people, just not going to accomplish what we all want.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RevJ said:

Wilks has shown he can take a bad team and make them average.   That's not the same as taking an average team and making them winners.  

I love the guy and what he stands for but watching today seemed to show he's not in Tomlin's class. When a team that has everything to play for gets trucked by a team that has no real reason to win it doesn't seem to be a good sign. He clearly has more substance than Rhule but I feel the same about hiring him long term that I do about darnold.  Good people, just not going to accomplish what we all want.

Low ceiling. Too low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Wundrbread33 said:

I mean the Steelers always beat the poo out of us. 
 

And did you hear when they kneeled for the win? This wasn’t a home game for us at all. Never is when they are in town. It’s pitiful. 

This, I fugging despise how Pittsburg is represented in this state. Same thing for the Penguins against the canes, they are always represented here. It is embarrassing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4Corners said:

I like Wilks

This is kind of a key phrase.

Damn near everybody likes Steve Wilks, and likewise everyone respects him.

But do we believe he's capable of leading the team to become a perennial contender?

I think we want to.

He's like that person you dated that you aren't really attracted to but you like so much you wish you were.

Over time though, you come to understand that's just not gonna happen 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

This is kind of a key phrase.

Damn near everybody likes Steve Wilks, and likewise everyone respects him.

But do we believe he's capable of leading the team to become a perennial contender?

I think we want to.

He's like that person you dated that you aren't really attracted to but you like so much you wish you were.

Over time though, you come to understand that's just not gonna happen 😕

Another thing that is not fair to him (or us) is we compare to him to Ruhle, who is the worst coach in team history. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...