Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Kaye, Observer comment on Wilks support


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, Panthera onca said:

I’m pretty much sold on the idea of cleaning house of all coaches and front office people and starting over from scratch. A totally new infusion of talent and ideas is sorely needed.

 

I want a coach that will come in and Continue the culture Wilks has started. Not tear it down and take a year or more instilling his own culture.

 

I think the next coach should be able to work with Fitz and his team to continue to build this team into a consistent winner. The core is there. Work together to finish the job.

 

IF we ever get a QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Waldo said:

He only deserves it if he is better than the compitition and there are better options out there.

This isn't about fair because that is a simplified concept for children before they learn how complicated reality really is. He should have earned the right to a new job next year and that is a massive upgrade for him over last year.

a 2 year deal is nothing its a prove it deal.he gets an off season to get the people in he wants and see how he does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

I want a coach that will come in and Continue the culture Wilks has started. Not tear it down and take a year or more instilling his own culture.

 

I think the next coach should be able to work with Fitz and his team to continue to build this team into a consistent winner. The core is there. Work together to finish the job.

 

IF we ever get a QB

People are over exaggerating this culture Wilks has built. Rhule was just that much of a team cancer 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Rex Trotter said:

a 2 year deal is nothing its a prove it deal.he gets an off season to get the people in he wants and see how he does.

It's a head coaching gig. It's all prove it regardless.

I have zero interest in watching more of that kind of football. We can do better and we should try.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Waldo said:

It's a head coaching gig. It's all prove it regardless.

I have zero interest in watching more of that kind of football. We can do better and we should try.

How come these people seem to just appear out of know where and being extremely antagonistic. I have never seen this Rex account before today. Makes me wonder if it is an alternate account for someone who has been banned. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

How come these people seem to just appear out of know where and being extremely antagonistic. I have never seen this Rex account before today. Makes me wonder if it is an alternate account for someone who has been banned. 

More than likely. A bunch of them have popped up this year for some reason and they are also seasoned accounts that just haven't had activity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

All directed by David Tepper? 😕

The total tepper move would be keeping Wilks. Cleaning it out would take guts that I'm not sure he has. Even the Rhule pick leads into that because Tepper just wanted someone to run everything. Not even the GM got a say. 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...