Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Moral “players love Wilks” victory next week!!!


Wanderlai
 Share

Recommended Posts

The only way we win against NO, in NO, is if they tank.  With that said, there is no way Wilks comes back next year.  Tepper don't give a crap about what they (the players) think.  Wilks' only shot was a deep playoff run.

Edited by Matthias
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Matthias said:

The only way we win against NO, in NO, is if they tank.  With that said, there is no way Wilks comes back next year.  Tepper don't give a crap about what they (the players) think.  Wilks' only shot was a deep playoff run.

Tepper should have stayed with Rhule. Wilks taking over gave the team enough mojo to win a few games knocking us out of a top 3 pick. Granted I couldn’t stand Rhule but the roadmap was set. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Yeah sure hope all those that wanted to win are happy with themselves. All we did was hurt our draft position when the smarter ones knew what was up.

These people will be the first ones saying trade up for a QB now.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wanderlai said:

Tepper should have stayed with Rhule. Wilks taking over gave the team enough mojo to win a few games knocking us out of a top 3 pick. Granted I couldn’t stand Rhule but the roadmap was set. 


In terms of a top 3 pick, if we could use it to trade back, I would see it as more valuable.  I thought this year would be a great QB class, but not so much now.  I'm not a believer in CJ Stroud, and the Alabama QB is too small.  Overall, I'm good with wherever we end up. (late top 10 or top 15).  Where we really screwed up was not trading away Brian Burns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should be interesting to see how we rebound. The mark of a good head coach is getting the best out of his players and getting them to rebound back from a loss rather than start a losing streak.

Why is it important to the players to win next week? Do you want to go out a loser or a winner? I know that ending your season with a loss leaves a bad taste in your mouth in the offseason versus going out on a good note.

Plus it is the Saints. We need to beat them because we don't like them.....

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Should be interesting to see how we rebound. The mark of a good head coach is getting the best out of his players and getting them to rebound back from a loss rather than start a losing streak.

Why is it important to the players to win next week? Do you want to go out a loser or a winner? I know that ending your season with a loss leaves a bad taste in your mouth in the offseason versus going out on a good note.

Plus it is the Saints. We need to beat them because we don't like them.....

Have you noticed many of the posters here's remarks regarding this next game?

They're more concerned with Draft position (as if we're going to win the offseason or something) than anything else.

If they could, they would have the Panthers just forfeit the game and move right on into the offseason without losing draft position.

 

Of course that's not going to happen and I can safely say the team will 100% next week.

I mean....Sam himself is basically auditioning for a job (he's made a great accounting of himself thus far) either with us or another team so I wouldn't be shocked to see him play well next game.   

 

 

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Have you noticed many of the posters here's remarks regarding this next game?

They're more concerned with Draft position (as if we're going to win the offseason or something) than anything else.

If they could, they would have the Panthers just forfeit the game and move right on into the offseason without losing draft position.

 

Of course that's not going to happen and I can safely say the team will 100% next week.

I mean....Sam himself is basically auditioning for a job (he's made a great accounting of himself thus far) either with us or another team so I wouldn't be shocked to see him play well next game.   

 

 

That is a good point his passer rating since starting is averaging 104. If we don't want him he has earned a spot on someone's roster heading into the offseason.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

That is a good point his passer rating since starting is averaging 104. If we don't want him he has earned a spot on someone's roster heading into the offseason.

 

Considering how there are many teams out there that are QB-starved, he may turn out to be the most sought-after QB in the Free Agent market.    Go figure.  lol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not necessarily trying to be flippant, but Morgan has been telling you what type of team he's trying to to build. So, if you have no idea, you just haven't been listening. @ForJimmy explained it pretty well. But, if you don't believe that, then all you have to do is go back and listen to all of the pressers since Morgan was promoted. Then go back and listen to Dave Canales' pressers since he's been here. Don't forget to listen to the pressers during the draft. You're complaining because you don't agree with the player---or perhaps players that were drafted, the mail one being X. I have consistently said that they should draft the player with the most upside, and that you can't limit your draft based upon perceived limitations (especially perceived limitations based upon some fans) of your QB, particularly if the QB is unproven. X has the most upside, and he needs to be developed for sure, but what you obviously fail to realize is that all of the receivers that we could've picked were "projects," save for maybe Ladd who is smallish, has an injury history, and would have offered some redundancy with what we already have. Most people consider him a slot guy. We already have guys that can play in the slot.  If anything, our choices in the draft probably mean that Mingo is solidly in the long term plans. Whether he succeeds or not will be on him for the most part, as well as the coaches to put him in his best position to succeed. Regarding that, he likely needs to be transitioned to the slot where I'm pretty sure some teams (the Steelers being one of them) would have placed him in had he been available. What we also have is JT Sanders who will be another tough competitor on our side at the catch point. He is big-bodied with high upside, and will provide even another potential beast in the second and third level, and another consistent option for our QB (and any QB).  Morgan and Canales obvious put a premium on receivers that can make tough catches, but that doesn't mean that these guys can't be polished up and coached up where necessary. But even if I look at a worse case scenario, if a wideout can make a tough catch, in the mold of Alshon Jeffrey or even Tee Higgins, then YAC is not as important. But the fact is, that both of our newly drafted wideouts have upside to be YAC monsters. So many people were banging the table for a center. I've said it all the way through: apparently our FO on down believes that AC can be a proficient center. It s not like he hasn't played it before. Moreover, we found out (and some of us already knew) that BC could be a backup. Well that's the plan. Until proven otherwise, I'm going to have faith that Canales and Joe Gilbert (as well as Dan Morgan) know what they're doing in that regard. I could be wrong, but I'm thinking that our O-line should at least be average. We'll find out, but I trust that this is not going to be an excuse for Bryce not to succeed in 2024. You've already seen the investment in the O-line, and in the offensive weapons. But Morgan also invested in the defense. We were decent last season, but inconsistent which lead to us being gashed. But the lack of offense also lead to the defense being gassed, which of course leads to being gashed as well. With the addition of the rookies and the additions of Robinson and Jewell, Fuller and of course Clowney and Wonnum, getting gashed in the run game will hopefully be a thing of the past. But the fact is that you can't fix everything in one offseason. However, if you can't see the plan and the vision, you just don't want to see it.   
    • I see it like this:  Can Coker beat out Terrace Marshall Jr?  Can Pinkey beat out Smith-Marsette (since Legette can return kicks) or Jonathan Mingo? I see Pinkney going to the PS for a season, but he will be pulled up if there is an injury--even if we stay healthy, in 2025, there will probably be two vacancies.  Not sure what Johnson is going to want $$$$, and Thielen will probably be done or cut.  Pinkney could then compete for a job, and with his height, he gives you that Tall red zone WR.   Worth keeping on the PS at the least.
    • I wouldn't you legit need 2-3 seasons too immediate post draft grades are one of the sports medias dumbest creations.
×
×
  • Create New...