Everyone Is Sad

[Actionman0z]

I’m only sad cause I bet 300 on panthers on moneyline and lost. After I bet 250 on Georgia to cover the -5 the night before. Brutal. 

[Aussie Tank]

39 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Again. He didn’t drafted and staff this team

he was quoted as telling snow his dline was too light for sustained success in the Nfl 

he was right 

He had his DC and wouldn’t even adjust a safety over the top of Evans pretty poor showing IMO 

[glenwo2]

Did anyone here hear (or see) what he said in his Postgame presser?

If you did, then those who call him a "scapegoat" shouldn't be calling him that since he scapegoated Sam. 

It is pathetic, really. 

As a head coach, you should always point the finger to yourself and he didn't.

Coaches who throw their own QBs under the bus aren't Coaches who get hired to be Head Coaches.

[ForJimmy]

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Me as a fan if that happens

/cdn-cgi/mirage/fca5f8343d5e151eec9f086213a99e9631041342c38fd104d3f1df356d4f8a92/1280/https://y.yarn.co/f1be903f-4ef0-434c-b590-98e9d36fa99d_text.gif

 

What if it’s Wilks with his own staff and a different QB? 

[LinvilleGorge]

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

What if it’s Wilks with his own staff and a different QB? 

That's not what he said. He said Wilks with Darnold back as the starter.

I'm not completely opposed with entertaining Wilks staying. But Darnold is not a long-term option at starting QB. If he's signed to backup money and is keeping the seat warm for a developing rookie, fine. But committing to Darnold long-term as the starter and I'm out. That'd be it.

[glenwo2]

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's not what he said. He said Wilks with Darnold back as the starter.

I'm not completely opposed with entertaining Wilks staying. But Darnold is not a long-term option at starting QB. If he's signed to backup money and is keeping the seat warm for a developing rookie, fine. But committing to Darnold long-term as the starter and I'm out. That'd be it.

You'll probably spend the majority of your time over at the Canes board, I assume. 

Edited January 2, 2023 by glenwo2

[ForJimmy]

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

That's not what he said. He said Wilks with Darnold back as the starter.

I'm not completely opposed with entertaining Wilks staying. But Darnold is not a long-term option at starting QB. If he's signed to backup money and is keeping the seat warm for a developing rookie, fine. But committing to Darnold long-term as the starter and I'm out. That'd be it.

Oh I know. I was just curious if it was more Wilks or Darnold that would piss you off the most about that move. 
Wilks with Ben Johnson or Pep Hamilton plus an experienced, successful DC would be interesting.

I don’t think Wilks would roll with Darnold as the answer. He was pretty adamant about wanting to trade up and draft his QB when he was at Arizona. Also the look in his face when Darnold threw that pick and fumbled the snap was pretty telling he isn’t sold on him…

[glenwo2]

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Oh I know. I was just curious if it was more Wilks or Darnold that would piss you off the most about that move. 
Wilks with Ben Johnson or Pep Hamilton plus an experienced, successful DC would be interesting.

I don’t think Wilks would roll with Darnold as the answer. He was pretty adamant about wanting to trade up and draft his QB when he was at Arizona. Also the look in his face when Darnold threw that pick and fumbled the snap was pretty telling he isn’t sold on him…

How was his look when Darnold threw those 3 Touchdowns? 

I think he had the same expression. 

 

Though throwing the QB under the bus and basically blaming him solely for the loss in his presser isn't a good look but I digress..

[CPF4LIFE]

I mean if didnt approve of the d line whos to say he was cool with the piss poor secondary outside of horn? He had to work with what he had.  This team wasnt stamped by wilks, he took it over after the trash was tossed out. 

[ForJimmy]

6 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

How was his look when Darnold threw those 3 Touchdowns? 

I think he had the same expression. 

 

Though throwing the QB under the bus and basically blaming him solely for the loss in his presser isn't a good look but I digress..

Did he blame Darnold in the presser?  I missed that...  

[glenwo2]

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Did he blame Darnold in the presser?  I missed that...  

yep.

[JawnyBlaze]

28 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Did anyone here hear (or see) what he said in his Postgame presser?

If you did, then those who call him a "scapegoat" shouldn't be calling him that since he scapegoated Sam. 

It is pathetic, really. 

As a head coach, you should always point the finger to yourself and he didn't.

Coaches who throw their own QBs under the bus aren't Coaches who get hired to be Head Coaches.

Rivera has made a career of it.

[JawnyBlaze]

26 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's not what he said. He said Wilks with Darnold back as the starter.

I'm not completely opposed with entertaining Wilks staying. But Darnold is not a long-term option at starting QB. If he's signed to backup money and is keeping the seat warm for a developing rookie, fine. But committing to Darnold long-term as the starter and I'm out. That'd be it.

I'd be much more ok with Darnold coming back than Wilks.  Much easier to cut bait on a journeyman QB (at this point in his career, that's his destiny) than a new HC.

[Mr. Scot]

9 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

yep.

I don't see anything there that sounds like him blaming or scapegoating Darnold.