Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will J.H's personality clash with D.T?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 1/6/2023 at 9:43 AM, Jmac said:

For arguments sake, let's say he is offered the job and accepts. Will his personality and Teppers conflict to cause problems?

Can he actually have a long tenure anywhere or does he last a few years at best?

Does a bear poo in the woods ?

if there is any validity to ‘history repeating’ or ‘past is prologue’, count on it.

 

Edited by raleigh-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Non-story. If he was so hard to work with he wouldn't have been employed as long as he has and have had the success he's had.

I'm calling B.S., it didn't come from Stanford or Michigan did it? The sh*t show front office in SF their media buddies and lazy highly paid underachievers get to define a man's character while their very own is highly questionable. Par for the course these days.

Carry on.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, SingleMalt said:

How did Jerry Jones and Jimmy Johnson work out ? The divorce sucked but the sex life from beginning to end was unbelievable.

The genesis of that breakup was Jones getting drunk.

That makes a better comparison to Jim Irsay than David Tepper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t think people are saying that picking up the option s a call for the pitchforks. We would have had to do things differently a couple of years back to make declining the option a valid move. We didn’t and here we are. People largely accept that. The patter it adheres to, reinforces the nausea we feel when the idea of an extension, and at top of the market no less, comes up.  One that he hasn’t shown he deserves.   Same as he did not deserve to be drafted 1.1. Look at Pavia and what really is the difference? Bryce is a nice guy and Pavia is an asshole lol. They are both no margin for error non day one talents. One went undrafted.  
    • We hate losing. I don't know Bryce to hate him. His play as a QB, I absolutely hate. It's just not good enough. If there were a lottery held to select the order and all 32 starting QBs could be drafted as the starting QB for whatever team selected them, how long do you think it would be before Bryce's name was called? Top 10, top 20, bottom 8? Think about it.  For me, having never seen back to back games with franchise QB level performance in 3 years tells me what I need to know. We still need to be looking for our solution at QB.     
    • Dude, I'm saying the Cardinals have proven they know nothing. Not saying keeping Bryce is the best choice long term, just saying that we've made the right move for this moment in time.  But man, the Cardinals are never a blueprint for success. Haven't been since they were in Chicago.
×
×
  • Create New...