Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No Jim Harbaugh - Carolina focusing attention elsewhere


therealmjl
 Share

Recommended Posts

if it's true that Harbaugh wanted 20m/year, a new GM, and full control?   I'm fine with Tepper walking away from that.

Wilks has proven he can coach this team and the players will work hard for him.  Other than not going for it on 4th and inches, fans really don't have much to honestly complain about what Wilks has been able to accomplish in the short tenure he's been in the role

 

  • Pie 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

if it's true that Harbaugh wanted 20m/year, a new GM, and full control?   I'm fine with Tepper walking away from that.

Wilks has proven he can coach this team and the players will work hard for him.  Other than not going for it on 4th and inches, fans really don't have much to honestly complain about what Wilks has been able to accomplish in the short tenure he's been in the role

 

Being a leader and getting guys to play hard for him and scheming for another nfl team are 2 completely different things. I respect the gravitas he brings and he would bring us back to respectability but we have to do better.   And it’s not the asst coaches it’s his entire old school mindset.   We have already done it that way 2x now.   It’s not that the style doesn’t work it just doesn’t work enough.   

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

if it's true that Harbaugh wanted 20m/year, a new GM, and full control?   I'm fine with Tepper walking away from that.

Wilks has proven he can coach this team and the players will work hard for him.  Other than not going for it on 4th and inches, fans really don't have much to honestly complain about what Wilks has been able to accomplish in the short tenure he's been in the role

 

We don’t know what all was being discussed. We don’t even know 100% if anything is accurate at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

We don’t know what all was being discussed. We don’t even know 100% if anything is accurate at this point. 

I don't know if those specifics are true, but It wouldn't shock me if Denver ownership was trying to make a big splash (same as Tepper did with his first hire).

I'd add that while we don't know what his desires/demands are, based on his general personality and what happened in Minnesota last year, it's not hard to figure that they're probably...substantial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

if it's true that Harbaugh wanted 20m/year, a new GM, and full control?   I'm fine with Tepper walking away from that.

Wilks has proven he can coach this team and the players will work hard for him.  Other than not going for it on 4th and inches, fans really don't have much to honestly complain about what Wilks has been able to accomplish in the short tenure he's been in the role

 

How about not beating a team with a winning record and going 5-6? He’s not the long term answer. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't know if those specifics are true, but It wouldn't shock me if Denver ownership was trying to make a big splash (same as Tepper did with his first hire).

I'd add that while we don't know what his desires/demands are, based on his general personality and what happened in Minnesota last year, it's not hard to figure that they're probably...substantial.

I mean Harbaugh is a big splash Rhule is not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...