Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold


panthertime
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Who? Btw QBR came along from ESPN many years after passer rating was the main metric for decades. Sam Darnold had a game so bad he's neck and neck with a QB from the 1980's for one of the bottom ten passing performances ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Who? Btw QBR came along from ESPN many years after passer rating was the main metric for decades. Sam Darnold had a game so bad he's neck and neck with a QB from the 1980's for one of the bottom ten passing performances ever.

None other than Anthony Richardson, against a mediocre Kentucky team.  The guy a lot of people are drooling over.  FYI, that wasn't his only stinker of a game either, just his worst.  This is not to defend Sam, but if people are going to drag one QB for a bad game (and it was) then I think it is silly to idolize a kid who is raw as heck and can completely shat the bed in some games too.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 45catfan said:

None other than Anthony Richardson, against a mediocre Kentucky team.  The guy a lot of people are drooling over.  FYI, that wasn't his only stinker of a game either, just his worst.  This is not to defend Sam, but if people are going to drag one QB for a bad game (and it was) then I think it is silly to idolize a kid who is raw as heck and can completely shat the bed in some games too.

who do you have as better-ar or revis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

None other than Anthony Richardson, against a mediocre Kentucky team.  The guy a lot of people are drooling over.  FYI, that wasn't his only stinker of a game either, just his worst.  This is not to defend Sam, but if people are going to drag one QB for a bad game (and it was) then I think it is silly to idolize a kid who is raw as heck and can completely shat the bed in some games too.

Well lucky for us Anthony Richardson isn't the only QB who declared for the 2023 NFL draft huh?

And I'm just saying but it's pretty damn disingenuous to compare a guy who has yet to even set foot on an NFL field to one who will be entering his 6th season in the league looking like trash.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

Well lucky for us Anthony Richardson isn't the only QB who declared for the 2023 NFL draft huh?

I mean, Levis may still be on the board.  People are smoking something if they think Young or Stroud will be there at #9.  And no, they aren't worth the trade haul to move up into the top 3 picks.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

None other than Anthony Richardson, against a mediocre Kentucky team.  The guy a lot of people are drooling over.  FYI, that wasn't his only stinker of a game either, just his worst.  This is not to defend Sam, but if people are going to drag one QB for a bad game (and it was) then I think it is silly to idolize a kid who is raw as heck and can completely shat the bed in some games too.

Yeah one is a raw QB that our staff could hopefully develop into a system that fits his strengths with a ceiling that is off the charts. The other is a 5th year NFL starter who is on his second team and shown he struggles reading defenses and struggles under pressure. If Sam was a rookie playing with his inconsistencies I wouldn’t be that concerned. A 5th year player playing like this is an issue.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Basbear said:

who do you have as better-ar or Levis?

Stroud and Young.  Both will be gone by pick 5.  Neither are good enough to mortgage a move up though.  Put Young into AR's body... I'd make that move.  However, Young is way too small and Stroud is not generational.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I mean, Levis may still be on the board.  People are smoking something if they think Young or Stroud will be there at #9.  And no, they aren't worth the trade haul to move up into the top 3 picks.

We may not think any of them are worth the trade up but the powers that be may have other plans. Whomever we draft that happens to be a QB I will accept it and support them until they give me a valid reason not to. All I ask for is a first round QB of our own that we drafted. I expect to very possibly swing and miss the first time I'm just gonna roll with it. We need to get a guy who can actually develop a QB too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah one is a raw QB that our staff could hopefully develop into a system that fits his strengths with a ceiling that is off the charts. The other is a 5th year NFL starter who is on his second team and shown he struggles reading defenses and struggles under pressure. If Sam was a rookie playing with his inconsistencies I wouldn’t be that concerned. A 5th year player playing like this is an issue.

Could develop or he could keep his bad habits.  Sam still has his old bad college habits.  Who's to say that AR won't do the same?  And when has this organization ever developed a QB?  Cam was the closest, but he still maintained his bad mechanics from college.   Short of a former OC taking the HC job, it will be the same results with developing QBs as in the past---piss poor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

QBR and QB rating are two different things.

Clausen had a 62.9 rating in that game. Darnold's QBR was 0.0 today and his rating was 2.8.

Yes, two different things, but both stat lines are completely horrible.  One really, REALLY sucks and the other just really sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

Could develop or he could keep his bad habits.  Sam still has his old bad college habits.  Who's to say that AR won't do the same?  And when has this organization ever developed a QB?  Cam was the closest, but he still maintained his bad mechanics from college.   Short of a former OC taking the HC job, it will be the same results with developing QBs as in the past---piss poor.

Developing a player is up to the staff we put around him. We are going to have a different group than we have had in the past. If it works out great! If not we just try to draft one again. It’s not like the old days when they had huge contracts tied to these rookies.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, frankw said:

We heard this in training camp 2021. He stinks it is what it is.

Probably, but he turns 25 in a few weeks.  He showed improvement, just not enough to give him a second contract for a starting QB.

I think, in the right situation, he could be adequate to decent.

But I was not saying Sam is good--I was saying that TODAY his WRs were not getting open. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There always has been collusion, as long as I have been a fan. It sure looks like they tweaked outcomes too. Good luck proving it. As much as I despise a lot of the ownership I'm still not sure what would happen if it was forced to change.
    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
×
×
  • Create New...