Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching interview updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, Actionman0z said:

And so are people here who also spell it Wilkes. Jesus. Get their names right. 

cry me a river.

Holcombe isn’t good enough at his job for anyone (but you apparently) to obsess over the proper spelling of his name.

Edited by therealmjl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't see this anywhere but . . . 

The Panthers’ search to replace former head coach Matt Rhule continued Monday evening as the organization requested interviews with Eagles offensive coordinator Shane Steichen and Lions offensive coordinator Ben Johnson, as reported separately by NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport and Tom Pelissero. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, t96 said:

no I don't watch college football and it's completely irrelevant. Harbaugh is proven at the NFL level with crappy QBs. If he gets himself a Mahomes type QB like Andy Reid did he'd be set up to build a dynasty. He's that good of an NFL coach. And Tepper is gonna blow it because of his ego

A "can't miss, sure fire hire" that does nothing but win that is a former 49er coach? Where have I heard that before? Think Stephen Colbert GIF by The Late Show With Stephen Colbert

 

Oh right! That ended up being this guy,

nov-2001-head-coach-george-seifert-of-th

And those results didn't turn out good at all.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Is this hostility/sarcasm or an actual request? Bc if there is an actual desire, I will set aside time this weekend to bring it up to the forum. I dont mind contributing to constructive conversation.

Actual request. I don't always agree with your posts, but you usually have good takes on things. So, disregard the previous post and please lay out your case. 😃

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Is this hostility/sarcasm or an actual request? Bc if there is an actual desire, I will set aside time this weekend to bring it up to the forum. I dont mind contributing to constructive conversation.

I don't think he's being sarcastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Is this hostility/sarcasm or an actual request? Bc if there is an actual desire, I will set aside time this weekend to bring it up to the forum. I dont mind contributing to constructive conversation.

If you have reasons why to not hire him and you did a bunch of research, why would you NOT post it?

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only WR that makes sense in the first is KC Concepcion. He fills multiple roles in the offense and is a PR specialist.
    • That depends upon what happens with receiver this year and what happens with free agency next year. Hopefully we'll be good by addressing receiver this year (regardless of whether we snag one in the first round or not). If we don't and are unlucky enough for to Coker get hurt (and X solidifies his bust status, and JAGs be JAGing), then we may be fùçked! But I assume that Dan Morgan and company will feel compelled to look for answers in free agency and use that to set up the draft just like this offseason.  Reality is not as simple as we drafted this position X times in a row in the first. If you're suggesting that we could draft a position in the first four times in a row, that's not likely. At some point probability has to be taken into account. I mean, how many years in a row can you be unlucky with one position?  As I've said at times before, you try and plan for the long term personnel-wise and cap-wise of course, but things happen so, in a sense, you still must look at each season--each "team" if you will--unto itself each season. So many things can happen between now and then. A major industry can profoundly impact the bigger picture (like this year), someone could offer you a trade proposal that you can't resist, players might not have progressed to your expectations--you know, things like that. Moreover, you have to be aware of the dynamics of each draft class, including the fact that there could be unexpected draft risers and fallers during the college season. That's a lot. As of today, we expect the 2027 draft to have more exclamations than question marks at OT and the QB class and WR group is expected to be exceptionally strong. We'll have a clearer picture of whatever we'll have to focus on next year at this time.  Lastly, keep in mind that there's always more than one way to get you to where you want to go. The yearly puzzle is not static, it's dynamic and complex.   
    • I'm fine with Thieneman or McNeil-Warren.. Rodriguez won't last until 51 so they would have to trade up, he may end up being a late first round selection. Anthony Hill Jr. is more likely to be available. I don't expect defense in the first round now after the murmurings of finding another weapon for Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...