Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Post your 2023 Off-season Predictions!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

My prediction is that Wilks will be named HC and we will get a new OC (don't know who but expect an old HC willing to collect a paycheck) and most of the current staff will be retained. We have big needs at QB, WR, TE, DT, CB and DE. I suspect we address 3 of the 6 decently in the first 3 rounds and choose to pass on addressing need late in the draft and go BPA. Not a bad plan as we can probably snatch more OL help and another running back late. Not expecting much in terms of FA as this franchise needs to clean up the payroll. 

  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/21/2023 at 7:18 PM, CamWhoaaCam said:

We already have a #1 WR. Rodgers only had Adams in GB.

 

Oline and a #1 WR is what Rodgers need the most. We have both checked. Those other positions can be filled through the draft.

Need more than that.  Rodgers showed that in GB. Rodgers had the best WR in the game......and it wasn't enough for him.   And DJ Moore isn't close to Adams. 

Last time the Packers went to a NFCCG.  Adams was the teams #2. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cut Shaq and Elfein to save 17 million. Restructure and or extend Burns, Luvu, Jackson, Thomas, Ioannidis, Moore. Free up about 35-40 million. 

 

FA Wish List:

Jessie Bates lll

Josh Jacobs

Dalton Schultz

Zach Allen 

TJ Edwards 

Ben Powers 

Mike Gesicki

Tony Pollard 

Dalton Risner 

Evan Engram 

 

Any combination of these guys will fill holes and give us the best chance at BPA in the early rounds of the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

The Huddle never disappoints. 

You can set your sundial to it.  It's always something, doesn't matter what it is. They come out of the woodwork to rage about anything that doesn't go their way. It's like a bunch of 5 year olds in her sometimes. 

Temper Tantrum GIF

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...